From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
Ben Warren <ben@skyportsystems.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.1 2/2] acpi: Decouple ACPI hotplug callbacks from HotplugHandler
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 09:39:16 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180724123916.GC3896@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180724142949.3078da82@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 02:29:49PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:31:45 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > The ACPI hotplug callbacks get a HotplugHandler object as
> > argument. This has two problems:
> >
> > 1) The functions require a TYPE_ACPI_DEVICE_IF object, but the
> > function prototype doesn't indicate that. It's possible to
> > pass an object that would make the function crash.
> > 2) The function does not require the object to implement
> > TYPE_HOTPLUG_HANDLER at all, but the function prototype
> > imposes that for no reason.
> >
> > Change the argument type to AcpiDeviceIf instead of
> > HotplugHandler.
> What is the motivation for this patch,
> do you actually get crashes?
I didn't get crashes, but the idea for the change came when
Michael asked me how to get the HotplugHandler object. I was
going to suggest current_machine (which is also a hotplug
handler), when I noticed he actually needed an AcpiDeviceIf
object.
The main motivation, however, is to simply make the function
prototypes make sense. Is there a single reason to make the ACPI
functions get a HotplugHandler argument instead of AcpiDeviceIf?
--
Eduardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-24 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-23 19:31 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.1 0/2] ACPI type safety cleanup Eduardo Habkost
2018-07-23 19:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.1 1/2] acpi: Improve acpi_send_event() type safety Eduardo Habkost
2018-07-24 12:27 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-07-23 19:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.1 2/2] acpi: Decouple ACPI hotplug callbacks from HotplugHandler Eduardo Habkost
2018-07-24 12:29 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-07-24 12:39 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2018-07-24 15:28 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-07-24 15:48 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-07-24 18:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-07-25 6:57 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-07-25 13:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180724123916.GC3896@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=ben@skyportsystems.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.