From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
gthelen@google.com
Subject: Re: cgroup-aware OOM killer, how to move forward
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 07:28:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180724142820.GL1934745@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180724142554.GQ28386@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:25:54PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> I am sorry but I do not follow. Besides that modeling the behavior on
> panic_on_oom doesn't really sound very appealing to me. The knob is a
> crude hack mostly motivated by debugging (at least its non-global
> variants).
Hmm... we actually do use that quite a bit in production (moving away
from it gradually).
> So can we get back to workloads and shape the semantic on top of that
> please?
I didn't realize we were that off track. Don't both map to what we
were discussing almost perfectly?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-24 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-11 22:40 cgroup-aware OOM killer, how to move forward Roman Gushchin
2018-07-12 12:07 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-12 15:55 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-07-13 21:34 ` David Rientjes
2018-07-13 22:16 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-07-13 22:39 ` David Rientjes
2018-07-13 23:05 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-07-13 23:11 ` David Rientjes
2018-07-13 23:16 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-07-17 4:19 ` David Rientjes
2018-07-17 12:41 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-17 17:38 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-07-17 19:49 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-17 20:06 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-07-17 20:41 ` David Rientjes
2018-07-17 20:52 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-07-20 8:30 ` David Rientjes
2018-07-20 11:21 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-20 16:13 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-07-20 20:28 ` David Rientjes
2018-07-20 20:47 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-07-23 23:06 ` David Rientjes
2018-07-23 14:12 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-18 8:19 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-18 8:12 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-18 15:28 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-07-19 7:38 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-19 17:05 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-07-20 8:32 ` David Rientjes
2018-07-23 14:17 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-23 15:09 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-24 7:32 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-24 13:08 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-24 13:26 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-24 13:31 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-24 13:50 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-24 13:55 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-24 14:25 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-24 14:28 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-07-24 14:35 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-24 14:43 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-24 14:49 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-24 15:52 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-07-25 12:00 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-25 11:58 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-30 8:03 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-30 14:04 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-30 15:29 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-07-24 11:59 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-25 0:10 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-07-25 12:23 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-25 13:01 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180724142820.GL1934745@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.