From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: virtio-dev-return-4735-cohuck=redhat.com@lists.oasis-open.org Sender: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Received: from lists.oasis-open.org (oasis-open.org [10.110.1.242]) by lists.oasis-open.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550B7985C88 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 13:02:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:02:31 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20180725150231.4c8bd3ae.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <054ef852-6131-b52d-9ce6-d3f95481ad80@intel.com> References: <1532365355-45245-1-git-send-email-sridhar.samudrala@intel.com> <20180724144351.5f8dd113.cohuck@redhat.com> <054ef852-6131-b52d-9ce6-d3f95481ad80@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] content: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature To: "Samudrala, Sridhar" , mst@redhat.com Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org List-ID: On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:27:33 -0700 "Samudrala, Sridhar" wrote: > On 7/24/2018 5:43 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > I still think we need a more detailed description of how this is > > supposed to work elsewhere (i.e., outside of the normative section). > > But we can probably merge an updated version of this patch to get at > > least the feature bit reserved and documented. Thoughts? > > Sure. I can submit a v3 version with the minor changes you suggested. > The detailed description of the failover mechanism can be added once qemu > patch to handle the standby feature bit is submitted and reviewed. > I am assuming someone in RH is looking into the qemu enablement patch. Sounds reasonable to me. Michael, what do you think? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org