From: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@redhat.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] libxfs: add more bounds checking to sb sanity checks
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 16:33:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180725213336.16263-1-billodo@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180713131003.31121-1-billodo@redhat.com>
Current sb verifier doesn't check bounds on sb_fdblocks and sb_ifree.
Add sanity checks for these parameters.
Signed-off-by: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@redhat.com>
---
v3: eliminate need for additional write_flag, doing those
unique checks in xfs_sb_write_verify()
v2: make extra sanity checks exclusive to writes
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
index b3ad15956366..f583fb8a10e1 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
@@ -599,22 +599,16 @@ xfs_sb_to_disk(
static int
xfs_sb_verify(
struct xfs_buf *bp,
+ struct xfs_sb *sb,
bool check_version)
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
- struct xfs_sb sb;
-
- /*
- * Use call variant which doesn't convert quota flags from disk
- * format, because xfs_mount_validate_sb checks the on-disk flags.
- */
- __xfs_sb_from_disk(&sb, XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp), false);
/*
* Only check the in progress field for the primary superblock as
* mkfs.xfs doesn't clear it from secondary superblocks.
*/
- return xfs_mount_validate_sb(mp, &sb,
+ return xfs_mount_validate_sb(mp, sb,
bp->b_maps[0].bm_bn == XFS_SB_DADDR,
check_version);
}
@@ -637,6 +631,7 @@ xfs_sb_read_verify(
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
struct xfs_dsb *dsb = XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp);
+ struct xfs_sb sb;
int error;
/*
@@ -657,7 +652,13 @@ xfs_sb_read_verify(
}
}
}
- error = xfs_sb_verify(bp, true);
+
+ /*
+ * Use call variant which doesn't convert quota flags from disk
+ * format, because xfs_mount_validate_sb checks the on-disk flags.
+ */
+ __xfs_sb_from_disk(&sb, XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp), false);
+ error = xfs_sb_verify(bp, &sb, true);
out_error:
if (error == -EFSCORRUPTED || error == -EFSBADCRC)
@@ -693,9 +694,26 @@ xfs_sb_write_verify(
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip = bp->b_log_item;
+ struct xfs_sb sb;
int error;
- error = xfs_sb_verify(bp, false);
+ /*
+ * Use call variant which doesn't convert quota flags from disk
+ * format, because xfs_mount_validate_sb checks the on-disk flags.
+ */
+ __xfs_sb_from_disk(&sb, XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp), false);
+
+ error = xfs_sb_verify(bp, &sb, false);
+
+ /* Additional sb sanity checks for writes */
+ if (!error) {
+ if (sb.sb_fdblocks > sb.sb_dblocks ||
+ sb.sb_ifree > sb.sb_icount) {
+ xfs_notice(mp, "SB sanity check failed");
+ error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
+ }
+ }
+
if (error) {
xfs_verifier_error(bp, error, __this_address);
return;
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-25 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-13 13:10 [PATCH] libxfs: add more bounds checking to sb sanity checks Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-13 16:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-13 20:06 ` Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-13 23:43 ` Dave Chinner
2018-07-17 17:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-16 19:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-17 9:17 ` Carlos Maiolino
2018-07-17 17:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-17 17:17 ` Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-17 19:12 ` Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-17 20:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-17 23:26 ` Dave Chinner
2018-07-18 20:07 ` Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-25 21:33 ` Bill O'Donnell [this message]
2018-07-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v3] " Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-25 21:58 ` Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-25 22:48 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-07-25 22:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-26 16:40 ` [PATCH v4] " Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-26 17:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-26 17:19 ` Bill O'Donnell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180725213336.16263-1-billodo@redhat.com \
--to=billodo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.