All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "mingo@kernel.org" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"jthumshirn@suse.de" <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
	"oleg@redhat.com" <oleg@redhat.com>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ebiederm@xmission.com" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"hare@suse.com" <hare@suse.com>,
	"jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RESEND] Avoid that SCSI device removal through sysfs triggers a deadlock
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 07:14:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180726141435.GV1934745@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4dbd740c0555eb1bfcb4181eeaca5e397b6ab63c.camel@wdc.com>

Hello,

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 02:09:41PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 06:35 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Making removal asynchronous this way sometimes causes issues because
> > whether the user sees the device released or not is racy.
> > kernfs/sysfs have mechanisms to deal with these cases - remove_self
> > and kernfs_break_active_protection().  Have you looked at those?
> 
> Hello Tejun,
> 
> The call stack in the patch description shows that sdev_store_delete() is
> involved in the deadlock. The implementation of that function is as follows:
> 
> static ssize_t
> sdev_store_delete(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> 		  const char *buf, size_t count)
> {
> 	if (device_remove_file_self(dev, attr))
> 		scsi_remove_device(to_scsi_device(dev));
> 	return count;
> };
> 
> device_remove_file_self() calls sysfs_remove_file_self() and that last
> function calls kernfs_remove_self(). In other words, kernfs_remove_self()
> is already being used. Please let me know if I misunderstood your comment.

So, here, because scsi_remove_device() is the one involved in the
circular dependency, just breaking the dependency chain on the file
itself (self removal) isn't enough.  You can wrap the whole operation
with kernfs_break_active_protection() to also move
scsi_remove_device() invocation outside the kernfs synchronization.
This will need to be piped through sysfs but shouldn't be too complex.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-26 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-25 17:38 [PATCH, RESEND] Avoid that SCSI device removal through sysfs triggers a deadlock Bart Van Assche
2018-07-26  1:47 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-07-26 11:46 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-07-26 11:46   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-07-26 12:50 ` Jack Wang
2018-07-26 13:35 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-26 14:09   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-26 14:14     ` tj [this message]
2018-07-26 21:57       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-30 14:13         ` tj
2018-07-30 17:28           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-30 17:31             ` tj
2018-07-30 17:50               ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-30 17:57                 ` tj
2018-07-29  4:03   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-30 14:17     ` tj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180726141435.GV1934745@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.