From: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libxfs: add more bounds checking to sb sanity checks
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 13:25:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180726182529.GB20780@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <153262651940.8934.17525988748289196893.stgit@magnolia>
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:35:19AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@redhat.com>
>
> Current sb verifier doesn't check bounds on sb_fdblocks and sb_ifree.
> Add sanity checks for these parameters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@redhat.com>
> [darrick: remove the icount check, tweak the comments a little]
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by:
Bill O'Donnell <billodo@redhat.com>
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> index b3ad15956366..b2c683588519 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> @@ -599,22 +599,16 @@ xfs_sb_to_disk(
> static int
> xfs_sb_verify(
> struct xfs_buf *bp,
> + struct xfs_sb *sb,
> bool check_version)
> {
> struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
> - struct xfs_sb sb;
> -
> - /*
> - * Use call variant which doesn't convert quota flags from disk
> - * format, because xfs_mount_validate_sb checks the on-disk flags.
> - */
> - __xfs_sb_from_disk(&sb, XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp), false);
>
> /*
> * Only check the in progress field for the primary superblock as
> * mkfs.xfs doesn't clear it from secondary superblocks.
> */
> - return xfs_mount_validate_sb(mp, &sb,
> + return xfs_mount_validate_sb(mp, sb,
> bp->b_maps[0].bm_bn == XFS_SB_DADDR,
> check_version);
> }
> @@ -637,6 +631,7 @@ xfs_sb_read_verify(
> {
> struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
> struct xfs_dsb *dsb = XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp);
> + struct xfs_sb sb;
> int error;
>
> /*
> @@ -657,7 +652,13 @@ xfs_sb_read_verify(
> }
> }
> }
> - error = xfs_sb_verify(bp, true);
> +
> + /*
> + * Use call variant which doesn't convert quota flags from disk
> + * format, because xfs_mount_validate_sb checks the on-disk flags.
> + */
> + __xfs_sb_from_disk(&sb, XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp), false);
> + error = xfs_sb_verify(bp, &sb, true);
>
> out_error:
> if (error == -EFSCORRUPTED || error == -EFSBADCRC)
> @@ -693,9 +694,33 @@ xfs_sb_write_verify(
> {
> struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
> struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip = bp->b_log_item;
> + struct xfs_sb sb;
> int error;
>
> - error = xfs_sb_verify(bp, false);
> + /*
> + * Use call variant which doesn't convert quota flags from disk
> + * format, because xfs_mount_validate_sb checks the on-disk flags.
> + */
> + __xfs_sb_from_disk(&sb, XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp), false);
> +
> + error = xfs_sb_verify(bp, &sb, false);
> + if (error)
> + goto err;
> +
> + /*
> + * Carry out additional sb sanity checks exclusively for writes.
> + * We don't do these checks for reads, since faulty parameters could
> + * be fixed in the log, and we shouldn't prohibit mounting for those
> + * cases.
> + */
> + if (sb.sb_fdblocks > sb.sb_dblocks ||
> + sb.sb_ifree > sb.sb_icount) {
> + xfs_notice(mp, "SB summary counter sanity check failed");
> + error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> +err:
> if (error) {
> xfs_verifier_error(bp, error, __this_address);
> return;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-26 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-26 17:35 [PATCH 1/2] libxfs: add more bounds checking to sb sanity checks Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-26 17:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: verify icount in superblock write Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-26 17:48 ` Bill O'Donnell
2018-07-26 23:20 ` Dave Chinner
2018-07-27 0:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-27 10:44 ` Brian Foster
2018-07-27 14:30 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-07-27 22:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-07-29 4:39 ` Dave Chinner
2018-07-30 12:36 ` Brian Foster
2018-07-26 18:25 ` Bill O'Donnell [this message]
2018-07-26 23:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] libxfs: add more bounds checking to sb sanity checks Dave Chinner
2018-07-27 15:05 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180726182529.GB20780@redhat.com \
--to=billodo@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.