All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Yasmin Beatriz <yasmins@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/ppc: simplify bcdadd/sub functions
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:48:26 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180727004826.GA3694@umbus.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180726194443.dnw75xlfjjtzcarm@yasmins-ThinkPad-T460>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6186 bytes --]

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 04:44:43PM -0300, Yasmin Beatriz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:40:20AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:13:04PM +0000, Yasmin Beatriz wrote:
> > > After solving a corner case in bcdsub, this patch simplifies the logic
> > > of both bcdadd/sub instructions by removing some unnecessary local flags.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Yasmin Beatriz <yasmins@linux.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > >  target/ppc/int_helper.c | 33 +++++++++------------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/target/ppc/int_helper.c b/target/ppc/int_helper.c
> > > index fa18e6e..b8ac4bb 100644
> > > --- a/target/ppc/int_helper.c
> > > +++ b/target/ppc/int_helper.c
> > > @@ -2671,16 +2671,14 @@ static int bcd_cmp_mag(ppc_avr_t *a, ppc_avr_t *b)
> > >      return 0;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -static int bcd_add_mag(ppc_avr_t *t, ppc_avr_t *a, ppc_avr_t *b, int *invalid,
> > > +static void bcd_add_mag(ppc_avr_t *t, ppc_avr_t *a, ppc_avr_t *b, int *invalid,
> > >                         int *overflow)
> > >  {
> > >      int carry = 0;
> > >      int i;
> > > -    int is_zero = 1;
> > >      for (i = 1; i <= 31; i++) {
> > >          uint8_t digit = bcd_get_digit(a, i, invalid) +
> > >                          bcd_get_digit(b, i, invalid) + carry;
> > > -        is_zero &= (digit == 0);
> > >          if (digit > 9) {
> > >              carry = 1;
> > >              digit -= 10;
> > > @@ -2689,26 +2687,20 @@ static int bcd_add_mag(ppc_avr_t *t, ppc_avr_t *a, ppc_avr_t *b, int *invalid,
> > >          }
> > >  
> > >          bcd_put_digit(t, digit, i);
> > > -
> > > -        if (unlikely(*invalid)) {
> > > -            return -1;
> > > -        }
> > >      }
> > >  
> > >      *overflow = carry;
> > > -    return is_zero;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -static int bcd_sub_mag(ppc_avr_t *t, ppc_avr_t *a, ppc_avr_t *b, int *invalid,
> > > +static void bcd_sub_mag(ppc_avr_t *t, ppc_avr_t *a, ppc_avr_t *b, int *invalid,
> > >                         int *overflow)
> > >  {
> > >      int carry = 0;
> > >      int i;
> > > -    int is_zero = 1;
> > > +
> > >      for (i = 1; i <= 31; i++) {
> > >          uint8_t digit = bcd_get_digit(a, i, invalid) -
> > >                          bcd_get_digit(b, i, invalid) + carry;
> > > -        is_zero &= (digit == 0);
> > >          if (digit & 0x80) {
> > >              carry = -1;
> > >              digit += 10;
> > > @@ -2717,14 +2709,9 @@ static int bcd_sub_mag(ppc_avr_t *t, ppc_avr_t *a, ppc_avr_t *b, int *invalid,
> > >          }
> > >  
> > >          bcd_put_digit(t, digit, i);
> > > -
> > > -        if (unlikely(*invalid)) {
> > > -            return -1;
> > > -        }
> > >      }
> > >  
> > >      *overflow = carry;
> > > -    return is_zero;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  uint32_t helper_bcdadd(ppc_avr_t *r,  ppc_avr_t *a, ppc_avr_t *b, uint32_t ps)
> > > @@ -2734,25 +2721,25 @@ uint32_t helper_bcdadd(ppc_avr_t *r,  ppc_avr_t *a, ppc_avr_t *b, uint32_t ps)
> > >      int sgnb = bcd_get_sgn(b);
> > >      int invalid = (sgna == 0) || (sgnb == 0);
> > >      int overflow = 0;
> > > -    int zero = 0;
> > >      uint32_t cr = 0;
> > >      ppc_avr_t result = { .u64 = { 0, 0 } };
> > >  
> > >      if (!invalid) {
> > >          if (sgna == sgnb) {
> > >              result.u8[BCD_DIG_BYTE(0)] = bcd_preferred_sgn(sgna, ps);
> > > -            zero = bcd_add_mag(&result, a, b, &invalid, &overflow);
> > > -            cr = (sgna > 0) ? CRF_GT : CRF_LT;
> > > +            bcd_add_mag(&result, a, b, &invalid, &overflow);
> > > +            cr = bcd_cmp_zero(&result);
> > >          } else if (bcd_cmp_mag(a, b) > 0) {
> > >              result.u8[BCD_DIG_BYTE(0)] = bcd_preferred_sgn(sgna, ps);
> > > -            zero = bcd_sub_mag(&result, a, b, &invalid, &overflow);
> > > +            bcd_sub_mag(&result, a, b, &invalid, &overflow);
> > >              cr = (sgna > 0) ? CRF_GT : CRF_LT;
> > >          } else if (bcd_cmp_mag(a, b) == 0) {
> > >              result.u8[BCD_DIG_BYTE(0)] = bcd_preferred_sgn(0, ps);
> > > -            zero = bcd_sub_mag(&result, b, a, &invalid, &overflow);
> > > +            bcd_sub_mag(&result, b, a, &invalid, &overflow);
> > 
> > I don't think you actually need the sub here, since you know the
> > result is going to be zero.
> 
> Right. Will fix this in v2.
> 
> > Although.. in all of the different-sign cases aren't we effectively
> > doing the subtraction twice - once in bcd_cmp_mag() then again in
> > bcd_sub_mag()?
> 
> Actually no, bcd_cmp_mag() compares the magnitude between 'a' and 'b'
> starting from the most significant digit and returns as soon as it finds
> a difference between the two of them. It helps to decide whether we're
> going to perform a - b or b - a.

Ah, good point.

> Anyway, I think the following code can make it easier to understand:
> 
> int magnitude;
> if (sgna == sgnb) {
>     // same thing
> } else {
>     magnitude = bdc_cmp_mag(a, b);
>     if (magnitude > 0) {
>         // do a - b
>     } else if (magnitude < 0) {
>         // do b - a
>     } else {
>         // 0
>     }
> }

Yes, I think that's a good idea.

> 
> > > +            cr = CRF_EQ;
> > >          } else {
> > >              result.u8[BCD_DIG_BYTE(0)] = bcd_preferred_sgn(sgnb, ps);
> > > -            zero = bcd_sub_mag(&result, b, a, &invalid, &overflow);
> > > +            bcd_sub_mag(&result, b, a, &invalid, &overflow);
> > >              cr = (sgnb > 0) ? CRF_GT : CRF_LT;
> > >          }
> > >      }
> > > @@ -2762,8 +2749,6 @@ uint32_t helper_bcdadd(ppc_avr_t *r,  ppc_avr_t *a, ppc_avr_t *b, uint32_t ps)
> > >          cr = CRF_SO;
> > >      } else if (overflow) {
> > >          cr |= CRF_SO;
> > > -    } else if (zero) {
> > > -        cr = CRF_EQ;
> > >      }
> > >  
> > >      *r = result;
> > 
> 
> 

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2018-07-27  0:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-24 12:13 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/ppc: simplify bcdadd/sub functions Yasmin Beatriz
2018-07-26  1:40 ` David Gibson
2018-07-26 19:44   ` Yasmin Beatriz
2018-07-27  0:48     ` David Gibson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180727004826.GA3694@umbus.fritz.box \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=yasmins@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.