From: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
To: devel@acpica.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH] arm64: clean the additional checks before calling ghes_notify_sea()
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:06:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180727100617.GB25592@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1532638907-46129-1-git-send-email-gengdongjiu@huawei.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1727 bytes --]
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 05:01:47PM -0400, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
> In order to remove the additional check before calling the
> ghes_notify_sea(), make stub definition when !CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu(a)huawei.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon(a)arm.com>
Will
> This cleanup is ever mentioned by Mark Rutland in [1]
>
> [1]:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/31/289
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 7 +------
> include/acpi/ghes.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index b8eecc7..9ffe01d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -727,12 +727,7 @@ static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> int handle_guest_sea(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned int esr)
> {
> - int ret = -ENOENT;
> -
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA))
> - ret = ghes_notify_sea();
> -
> - return ret;
> + return ghes_notify_sea();
> }
>
> asmlinkage void __exception do_mem_abort(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
> diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> index 1624e2b..82cb4eb 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/ghes.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> @@ -118,6 +118,10 @@ static inline void *acpi_hest_get_next(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata)
> (void *)section - (void *)(estatus + 1) < estatus->data_length; \
> section = acpi_hest_get_next(section))
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA
> int ghes_notify_sea(void);
> +#else
> +static inline int ghes_notify_sea(void) { return -ENOENT; }
> +#endif
>
> #endif /* GHES_H */
> --
> 1.9.1
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, lenb@kernel.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, erik.schmauss@intel.com,
robert.moore@intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
devel@acpica.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: clean the additional checks before calling ghes_notify_sea()
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:06:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180727100617.GB25592@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532638907-46129-1-git-send-email-gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 05:01:47PM -0400, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
> In order to remove the additional check before calling the
> ghes_notify_sea(), make stub definition when !CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Will
> This cleanup is ever mentioned by Mark Rutland in [1]
>
> [1]:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/31/289
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 7 +------
> include/acpi/ghes.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index b8eecc7..9ffe01d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -727,12 +727,7 @@ static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> int handle_guest_sea(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned int esr)
> {
> - int ret = -ENOENT;
> -
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA))
> - ret = ghes_notify_sea();
> -
> - return ret;
> + return ghes_notify_sea();
> }
>
> asmlinkage void __exception do_mem_abort(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
> diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> index 1624e2b..82cb4eb 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/ghes.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> @@ -118,6 +118,10 @@ static inline void *acpi_hest_get_next(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata)
> (void *)section - (void *)(estatus + 1) < estatus->data_length; \
> section = acpi_hest_get_next(section))
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA
> int ghes_notify_sea(void);
> +#else
> +static inline int ghes_notify_sea(void) { return -ENOENT; }
> +#endif
>
> #endif /* GHES_H */
> --
> 1.9.1
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: clean the additional checks before calling ghes_notify_sea()
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:06:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180727100617.GB25592@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532638907-46129-1-git-send-email-gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 05:01:47PM -0400, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
> In order to remove the additional check before calling the
> ghes_notify_sea(), make stub definition when !CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Will
> This cleanup is ever mentioned by Mark Rutland in [1]
>
> [1]:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/31/289
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 7 +------
> include/acpi/ghes.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index b8eecc7..9ffe01d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -727,12 +727,7 @@ static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> int handle_guest_sea(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned int esr)
> {
> - int ret = -ENOENT;
> -
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA))
> - ret = ghes_notify_sea();
> -
> - return ret;
> + return ghes_notify_sea();
> }
>
> asmlinkage void __exception do_mem_abort(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
> diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> index 1624e2b..82cb4eb 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/ghes.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> @@ -118,6 +118,10 @@ static inline void *acpi_hest_get_next(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata)
> (void *)section - (void *)(estatus + 1) < estatus->data_length; \
> section = acpi_hest_get_next(section))
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA
> int ghes_notify_sea(void);
> +#else
> +static inline int ghes_notify_sea(void) { return -ENOENT; }
> +#endif
>
> #endif /* GHES_H */
> --
> 1.9.1
>
next prev reply other threads:[~2018-07-27 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-26 21:01 [Devel] [PATCH] arm64: clean the additional checks before calling ghes_notify_sea() Dongjiu Geng
2018-07-26 21:01 ` Dongjiu Geng
2018-07-26 21:01 ` Dongjiu Geng
2018-07-26 21:01 ` Dongjiu Geng
2018-07-27 10:06 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2018-07-27 10:06 ` Will Deacon
2018-07-27 10:06 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-05 2:35 ` gengdongjiu
2018-08-05 2:35 ` gengdongjiu
2018-08-05 2:35 ` gengdongjiu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-08-07 6:37 [Devel] " gengdongjiu
2018-08-07 6:37 ` gengdongjiu
2018-08-07 6:37 ` gengdongjiu
2018-08-07 6:37 ` gengdongjiu
2018-08-06 14:26 [Devel] " Will Deacon
2018-08-06 14:26 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-06 14:26 ` Will Deacon
2018-07-26 21:01 [Devel] " Dongjiu Geng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180727100617.GB25592@arm.com \
--to=devel@acpica.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.