From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 23:23:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:48440 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23993024AbeG0VXwDhLP3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 23:23:52 +0200 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w6RLIU1U017518 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:23:50 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2kgb0ngg6s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:23:49 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 22:23:48 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 27 Jul 2018 22:23:44 +0100 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w6RLNhEM7536894 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 21:23:43 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590F242041; Sat, 28 Jul 2018 00:23:57 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1324203F; Sat, 28 Jul 2018 00:23:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from rapoport-lnx (unknown [9.148.206.116]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sat, 28 Jul 2018 00:23:56 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 00:23:40 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Paul Burton Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Ralf Baechle , James Hogan , Huacai Chen , Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Serge Semin Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: switch to NO_BOOTMEM References: <1531727262-11520-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180726070355.GD8477@rapoport-lnx> <20180726172005.pgjmkvwz2lpflpor@pburton-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180726172005.pgjmkvwz2lpflpor@pburton-laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18072721-4275-0000-0000-0000029F907C X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18072721-4276-0000-0000-000037A795F4 Message-Id: <20180727212339.GC17745@rapoport-lnx> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-07-27_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=971 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1807270216 Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 65216 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:20:05AM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > Hi Mike, > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:03:56AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > Any comments on this? > > I haven't looked at this in detail yet, but there was a much larger > series submitted to accomplish this not too long ago, which needed > another revision: > > https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/project/linux-mips/list/?series=787&state=* > > Given that, I'd be (pleasantly) surprised if this one smaller patch is > enough. I didn't test it on the real hardware, so I could have missed something. I've looked at Sergey's patches, largely we are doing the same things. > Thanks, > Paul > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.