From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] boot/uboot: Really use host-dtc
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 09:05:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180801090548.0c92457b@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea2ac147-3c9f-a85d-83ea-84f33a0d52e4@mind.be>
Hello,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 00:14:08 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> > I think the optional dependency on host-dtc depends from a time where
> > U-Boot did not have its own copy of DTC. I'm not sure it makes a lot of
> > sense now.
>
> ... but we still want to support those older U-Boot versions, so we can't
> remove it.
Absolutely.
But the case found by David is not a case where U-Boot needs a DTC
available on the host: it tries to use its own internal DTC, but
forgets to build it. That's a bug in U-Boot.
> Ideally, we should find out between which two versions it is needed, and
> mention that in the help text.
>
> > If U-Boot tries to use ./scripts/dtc/dtc, then it should have built it.
> > If it didn't build it but tries to use it nonetheless, it sounds like a
> > bug in U-Boot.
>
> Oh yes, now I see it, it's indeed a bug in U-Boot. CONFIG_OF_LIST should either
> depend on CONFIG_OF_CONTROL or select it, otherwise dtc is not built.
Right, so it's indeed a bug in U-Boot. That being said, the change
proposed by David is not too bad: it makes sense to use the host DTC if
it was built, rather than the one built by U-Boot. It's just that the
initial problem explanation wasn't really complete enough, so I was a
bit confused.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-01 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-26 10:36 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/1] boot/uboot: host-dtc is not used as expected David De Grave
2018-07-26 10:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] boot/uboot: Really use host-dtc David De Grave
2018-07-28 19:48 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-07-31 18:12 ` David De Grave
2018-07-31 18:51 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-07-31 22:14 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-08-01 7:05 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-08-01 10:36 ` David De Grave
2018-08-01 10:43 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-01 14:36 ` David De Grave
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180801090548.0c92457b@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.