From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Snitzer Subject: Re: LVM snapshot broke between 4.14 and 4.16 Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 15:33:50 -0400 Message-ID: <20180803193349.GB4581@redhat.com> References: <1ec0a220-d5b0-1c27-e63b-c4d3f4ce9d77@torlan.ru> <20180803133102.GA3092@redhat.com> <20180803152034.GD32066@thunk.org> <20180803183932.GA3258@redhat.com> <20180803190617.GA4498@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Jens Axboe , Sagi Grimberg , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-block , dm-devel@redhat.com, Ilya Dryomov , wgh@torlan.ru, Zdenek Kabelac List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Fri, Aug 03 2018 at 3:11pm -0400, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 12:06 PM Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > > But you're making Zdenek's response into mine and threathening to no > > longer pull from me. > > No. I'm *very* unhappy about how you seem to think that Zdenek's > response was even half-way ok, and you jumped in when Ted said it > wasn't. I'm inclined not to make people who aren't kernel developers cry over spilt milk. But zero tolerance of kernel regressions is important. And that mantra wasn't properly impressed upon lvm2 developers.