From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [stmmac][bug?] endianness of Flexible RX Parser code
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 02:19:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180804011952.GD30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
The values passed in struct tc_u32_sel ->mask and ->val are
32bit net-endian. Your tc_fill_entry() does this:
data = sel->keys[0].val;
mask = sel->keys[0].mask;
...
entry->frag_ptr = frag;
entry->val.match_en = (mask << (rem * 8)) &
GENMASK(31, rem * 8);
entry->val.match_data = (data << (rem * 8)) &
GENMASK(31, rem * 8);
entry->val.frame_offset = real_off;
entry->prio = prio;
frag->val.match_en = (mask >> (rem * 8)) &
GENMASK(rem * 8 - 1, 0);
frag->val.match_data = (data >> (rem * 8)) &
GENMASK(rem * 8 - 1, 0);
frag->val.frame_offset = real_off + 1;
frag->prio = prio;
frag->is_frag = true;
and that looks very odd. rem here is offset modulo 4. Suppose offset is
equal to 5, val contains {V0, V1, V2, V3} and mask - {M0, M1, M2, M3}.
Then on little-endian host we get
entry->val.match_en: {0, M0, M1, M2}
entry->val.match_data: {0, V0, V1, V2}
entry->val.frame_offset = 1;
frag->val.match_en: {M3, 0, 0, 0}
frag->val.match_data: {V3, 0, 0, 0}
frag->val.frame_offset = 2;
and on big-endian
entry->val.match_en: {M1, M2, M3, 0}
entry->val.match_data: {V1, V2, V3, 0}
entry->val.frame_offset = 1;
frag->val.match_en: {0, 0, 0, M0}
frag->val.match_data: {0, 0, 0, V0}
frag->val.frame_offset = 2;
Little-endian variant looks like we mask octets 5, 6, 7 and 8 with
M0..M3 resp. and want V0..V3 in those. On big-endian, though, we
look at the octets 11, 4, 5 and 6 instead.
I don't know the hardware (and it might be pulling any kind of weird
endianness-dependent stunts), but that really smells like a bug.
It looks like that code is trying to do something like
data = ntohl(sel->keys[0].val);
mask = ntohl(sel->keys[0].mask);
shift = rem * 8;
entry->val.match_en = htonl(mask >> shift);
entry->val.match_data = htonl(data >> shift);
entry->val.frame_offset = real_off;
...
frag->val.match_en = htonl(mask << (32 - shift));
frag->val.match_data = htonl(data << (32 - shift));
entry->val.frame_offset = real_off + 1;
Comments?
next reply other threads:[~2018-08-04 3:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-04 1:19 Al Viro [this message]
2018-08-06 8:56 ` [stmmac][bug?] endianness of Flexible RX Parser code Jose Abreu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180804011952.GD30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.