From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: refresh recent accessed nat entry in lru list
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 23:08:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180805150900.9941-1-chao@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Introduce nat_list_lock to protect nm_i->nat_entries list, and manage
it as a LRU list, refresh location for therein recent accessed entries
in the list.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
fs/f2fs/node.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index f4b03339799e..afcdba241c4b 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -780,6 +780,7 @@ struct f2fs_nm_info {
struct radix_tree_root nat_set_root;/* root of the nat set cache */
struct rw_semaphore nat_tree_lock; /* protect nat_tree_lock */
struct list_head nat_entries; /* cached nat entry list (clean) */
+ spinlock_t nat_list_lock; /* protect clean nat entry list */
unsigned int nat_cnt; /* the # of cached nat entries */
unsigned int dirty_nat_cnt; /* total num of nat entries in set */
unsigned int nat_blocks; /* # of nat blocks */
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 81fb2f3edb52..472dd643b074 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -174,14 +174,30 @@ static struct nat_entry *__init_nat_entry(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
if (raw_ne)
node_info_from_raw_nat(&ne->ni, raw_ne);
+
+ spin_lock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
list_add_tail(&ne->list, &nm_i->nat_entries);
+ spin_unlock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
+
nm_i->nat_cnt++;
return ne;
}
static struct nat_entry *__lookup_nat_cache(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, nid_t n)
{
- return radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->nat_root, n);
+ struct nat_entry *ne;
+
+ ne = radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->nat_root, n);
+
+ /* for recent accessed nat entry, move it to tail of lru list */
+ if (ne && !get_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY)) {
+ spin_lock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
+ if (!list_empty(&ne->list))
+ list_move_tail(&ne->list, &nm_i->nat_entries);
+ spin_unlock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
+ }
+
+ return ne;
}
static unsigned int __gang_lookup_nat_cache(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
@@ -192,7 +208,6 @@ static unsigned int __gang_lookup_nat_cache(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
static void __del_from_nat_cache(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, struct nat_entry *e)
{
- list_del(&e->list);
radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->nat_root, nat_get_nid(e));
nm_i->nat_cnt--;
__free_nat_entry(e);
@@ -243,16 +258,21 @@ static void __set_nat_cache_dirty(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt++;
set_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY, true);
refresh_list:
+ spin_lock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
if (new_ne)
list_del_init(&ne->list);
else
list_move_tail(&ne->list, &head->entry_list);
+ spin_unlock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
}
static void __clear_nat_cache_dirty(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
struct nat_entry_set *set, struct nat_entry *ne)
{
+ spin_lock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
list_move_tail(&ne->list, &nm_i->nat_entries);
+ spin_unlock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
+
set_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY, false);
set->entry_cnt--;
nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt--;
@@ -469,13 +489,25 @@ int f2fs_try_to_free_nats(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
if (!down_write_trylock(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock))
return 0;
- while (nr_shrink && !list_empty(&nm_i->nat_entries)) {
+ spin_lock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
+ while (nr_shrink) {
struct nat_entry *ne;
+
+ if (list_empty(&nm_i->nat_entries))
+ break;
+
ne = list_first_entry(&nm_i->nat_entries,
struct nat_entry, list);
+ list_del(&ne->list);
+ spin_unlock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
+
__del_from_nat_cache(nm_i, ne);
nr_shrink--;
+
+ spin_lock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
}
+ spin_unlock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
+
up_write(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
return nr - nr_shrink;
}
@@ -2906,6 +2938,7 @@ static int init_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
INIT_RADIX_TREE(&nm_i->nat_root, GFP_NOIO);
INIT_RADIX_TREE(&nm_i->nat_set_root, GFP_NOIO);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nm_i->nat_entries);
+ spin_lock_init(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
mutex_init(&nm_i->build_lock);
spin_lock_init(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
@@ -3024,8 +3057,13 @@ void f2fs_destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
unsigned idx;
nid = nat_get_nid(natvec[found - 1]) + 1;
- for (idx = 0; idx < found; idx++)
+ for (idx = 0; idx < found; idx++) {
+ spin_lock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
+ list_del(&natvec[idx]->list);
+ spin_unlock(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
+
__del_from_nat_cache(nm_i, natvec[idx]);
+ }
}
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, nm_i->nat_cnt);
--
2.18.0
next reply other threads:[~2018-08-05 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-05 15:08 Chao Yu [this message]
2018-08-05 15:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: fix incorrect range->len in f2fs_trim_fs() Chao Yu
2018-08-05 15:09 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180805150900.9941-1-chao@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.