From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines per GPIO chip Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 05:38:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20180806033802.GA32450@lunn.ch> References: <1533522556-55055-1-git-send-email-aditya@kobol.io> <1533522556-55055-2-git-send-email-aditya@kobol.io> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1533522556-55055-2-git-send-email-aditya@kobol.io> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Aditya Prayoga Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Richard Genoud , Gregory CLEMENT , Gauthier Provost , Alban Browaeys , Thierry Reding , Linus Walleij , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dennis Gilmore , Ralph Sennhauser List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 10:29:15AM +0800, Aditya Prayoga wrote: Hi Aditya > + item = kzalloc(sizeof(*item), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!item) > + return -ENODEV; ENOMEM would be better, since it is a memory allocation which is failing. > > - ret = gpiod_direction_output(desc, 0); > - if (ret) { > - gpiochip_free_own_desc(desc); > - goto out; > - } > + spin_lock_irqsave(&mvpwm->lock, flags); > + desc = gpiochip_request_own_desc(&mvchip->chip, > + pwm->hwpwm, "mvebu-pwm"); > + if (IS_ERR(desc)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(desc); > + goto out; > + } > > - mvpwm->gpiod = desc; > + ret = gpiod_direction_output(desc, 0); > + if (ret) { > + gpiochip_free_own_desc(desc); > + goto out; > } > + item->gpiod = desc; > + item->device = pwm; > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&item->node); > + list_add_tail(&item->node, &mvpwm->pwms); > out: > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mvpwm->lock, flags); > return ret; You don't cleanup item on the error path. > @@ -630,12 +639,20 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) > static void mvebu_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) > { > struct mvebu_pwm *mvpwm = to_mvebu_pwm(chip); > + struct mvebu_pwm_item *item, *tmp; > unsigned long flags; > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&mvpwm->lock, flags); > - gpiochip_free_own_desc(mvpwm->gpiod); > - mvpwm->gpiod = NULL; > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mvpwm->lock, flags); > + list_for_each_entry_safe(item, tmp, &mvpwm->pwms, node) { > + if (item->device == pwm) { > + spin_lock_irqsave(&mvpwm->lock, flags); > + gpiochip_free_own_desc(item->gpiod); > + item->gpiod = NULL; > + item->device = NULL; Since you are about to free item, these two lines are pointless. > + list_del(&item->node); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mvpwm->lock, flags); > + kfree(item); > + } > + } > } Andrew