From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: Pravin Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>
Cc: Matteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com>,
Justin Pettit <jpettit@vmware.com>,
Greg Rose <gvrose8192@gmail.com>, Ben Pfaff <blp@ovn.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, ovs dev <dev@openvswitch.org>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>, Aaron <aconole@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] openvswitch: Queue upcalls to userspace in per-port round-robin order
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:39:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180807153923.61a0cfda@epycfail> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180807153111.53b0da8d@epycfail>
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:31:11 +0200
Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> wrote:
> I would instead try to address the concerns that you had about the
> original patch adding fairness in the kernel, rather than trying to
> make the issue appear less severe in ovs-vswitchd.
And, by the way, if we introduce a way to configure the possible
fairness algorithms via netlink, we can also rather easily allow
ovs-vswitchd to disable fairness on kernel side altogether, should it
be needed.
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-07 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-04 14:23 [PATCH RFC net-next] openvswitch: Queue upcalls to userspace in per-port round-robin order Matteo Croce
[not found] ` <20180704142342.21740-1-mcroce-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2018-07-10 18:31 ` Pravin Shelar
2018-07-16 16:54 ` Matteo Croce
2018-07-31 19:43 ` Matteo Croce
[not found] ` <CAGnkfhyxQSz=8OsgTsjR3NfZ2FPwv+FjPZNPEY5VHZRsEiQ68w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-07-31 22:06 ` Ben Pfaff
2018-08-03 16:52 ` Stefano Brivio
2018-08-03 23:01 ` Ben Pfaff
2018-08-04 0:43 ` Stefano Brivio
2018-08-04 0:54 ` Ben Pfaff
2018-08-10 14:11 ` William Tu
2018-08-14 15:25 ` Stefano Brivio
2018-07-31 23:12 ` Pravin Shelar
2018-08-07 13:31 ` Stefano Brivio
2018-08-07 13:39 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2018-08-15 7:19 ` Pravin Shelar
[not found] ` <CAOrHB_DaA-+J=jzNOdQiUYrA7RJi30HmRESjsmGs7_z1ffpVOA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-08-16 21:07 ` Stefano Brivio
2018-09-26 9:58 ` Stefano Brivio
2018-09-28 17:15 ` Pravin Shelar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180807153923.61a0cfda@epycfail \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=blp@ovn.org \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=gvrose8192@gmail.com \
--cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=jpettit@vmware.com \
--cc=mcroce@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.