From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf ordered_events: fix crash in free_dup_event()
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 13:54:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180810115431.GA4162@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBQEfoMDEqot1VbgExg1fU3+EEunzZqDFKSGmLKBhxNkwA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 01:21:18AM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 1:07 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 03:33:20PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > > This patch fixes a bug in ordered_event.c:alloc_event().
> > > An ordered_event struct was not initialized properly potentially
> > > causing crashes later on in free_dup_event() depending on the
> > > content of the memory. If it was NULL, then it would work fine,
> > > otherwise, it could cause crashes such as:
> >
> > I'm now little puzzled what do we use this first event for..
> > I can't see anything special about it, other than it's added
> > on the list uninitialized ;-)
> >
> > it seems to work properly when we ditch it.. might be some
> > prehistoric leftover or I'm terribly missing something
> >
> You need to keep track of the buffers to free. You do not free the
> ordered_event structs
> individually. For each oe->buffer, you need one free(). Each buffer is
> put in the to_free
> list. But to link it into the list it needs a list_head. This is what
> buffer[0] is used for.
> But the logic is broken in ordered_events__free(). It does not free individual
> ordered_event structs, but a buffer with many. Yet, it is missing
> freeing all of the duped
> events.
>
> void ordered_events__free(struct ordered_events *oe)
> {
> while (!list_empty(&oe->to_free)) {
> struct ordered_event *buffer;
>
> buffer = list_entry(oe->to_free.next, struct
> ordered_event, list);
> list_del(&buffer->list);
> ----> free_dup_event(oe, event->event);
> free(buffer);
> }
> }
> This only frees the dup_event of buffer[0] which we know is NULL (well, now).
> It needs to walk all the entries in buffer[] to free buffer[x].event.
yes.. if there's copy_on_queue set, we need to do that,
otherwise we're leaking all the events
>
> I think the goal was likely to avoid adding another list_head field to
> each ordered_event
> and instead use one per allocated buffer.
> This is very convoluted and prone to errors and we are seeing right
> now. This should
> be cleaned. So either you add a list_head to ordered_event or you
> would buffer[x] in
> ordered_events_free().
>
> At this point, this is my understanding.
> Do you agree?
yea, I see it now.. thanks for pointing this out
how about something like below? haven't tested properly yet
jirka
---
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/ordered-events.c b/tools/perf/util/ordered-events.c
index bad9e0296e9a..5c0d85e90a18 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/ordered-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/ordered-events.c
@@ -80,14 +80,20 @@ static union perf_event *dup_event(struct ordered_events *oe,
return oe->copy_on_queue ? __dup_event(oe, event) : event;
}
-static void free_dup_event(struct ordered_events *oe, union perf_event *event)
+static void __free_dup_event(struct ordered_events *oe, union perf_event *event)
{
- if (event && oe->copy_on_queue) {
+ if (event) {
oe->cur_alloc_size -= event->header.size;
free(event);
}
}
+static void free_dup_event(struct ordered_events *oe, union perf_event *event)
+{
+ if (oe->copy_on_queue)
+ __free_dup_event(oe, event);
+}
+
#define MAX_SAMPLE_BUFFER (64 * 1024 / sizeof(struct ordered_event))
static struct ordered_event *alloc_event(struct ordered_events *oe,
union perf_event *event)
@@ -104,11 +110,11 @@ static struct ordered_event *alloc_event(struct ordered_events *oe,
new = list_entry(cache->next, struct ordered_event, list);
list_del(&new->list);
} else if (oe->buffer) {
- new = oe->buffer + oe->buffer_idx;
+ new = &oe->buffer->event[oe->buffer_idx];
if (++oe->buffer_idx == MAX_SAMPLE_BUFFER)
oe->buffer = NULL;
} else if (oe->cur_alloc_size < oe->max_alloc_size) {
- size_t size = MAX_SAMPLE_BUFFER * sizeof(*new);
+ size_t size = sizeof(*oe->buffer) + MAX_SAMPLE_BUFFER * sizeof(*new);
oe->buffer = malloc(size);
if (!oe->buffer) {
@@ -122,9 +128,8 @@ static struct ordered_event *alloc_event(struct ordered_events *oe,
oe->cur_alloc_size += size;
list_add(&oe->buffer->list, &oe->to_free);
- /* First entry is abused to maintain the to_free list. */
- oe->buffer_idx = 2;
- new = oe->buffer + 1;
+ oe->buffer_idx = 1;
+ new = &oe->buffer->event[0];
} else {
pr("allocation limit reached %" PRIu64 "B\n", oe->max_alloc_size);
}
@@ -300,15 +305,27 @@ void ordered_events__init(struct ordered_events *oe, ordered_events__deliver_t d
oe->deliver = deliver;
}
+static void
+ordered_events_buffer__free(struct ordered_events_buffer *buffer,
+ struct ordered_events *oe)
+{
+ if (oe->copy_on_queue) {
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_SAMPLE_BUFFER; i++)
+ __free_dup_event(oe, buffer->event[i].event);
+ }
+
+ free(buffer);
+}
+
void ordered_events__free(struct ordered_events *oe)
{
- while (!list_empty(&oe->to_free)) {
- struct ordered_event *event;
+ struct ordered_events_buffer *buffer, *tmp;
- event = list_entry(oe->to_free.next, struct ordered_event, list);
- list_del(&event->list);
- free_dup_event(oe, event->event);
- free(event);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(buffer, tmp, &oe->to_free, list) {
+ list_del(&buffer->list);
+ ordered_events_buffer__free(buffer, oe);
}
}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/ordered-events.h b/tools/perf/util/ordered-events.h
index 8c7a2948593e..1338d5c345dc 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/ordered-events.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/ordered-events.h
@@ -25,23 +25,28 @@ struct ordered_events;
typedef int (*ordered_events__deliver_t)(struct ordered_events *oe,
struct ordered_event *event);
+struct ordered_events_buffer {
+ struct list_head list;
+ struct ordered_event event[0];
+};
+
struct ordered_events {
- u64 last_flush;
- u64 next_flush;
- u64 max_timestamp;
- u64 max_alloc_size;
- u64 cur_alloc_size;
- struct list_head events;
- struct list_head cache;
- struct list_head to_free;
- struct ordered_event *buffer;
- struct ordered_event *last;
- ordered_events__deliver_t deliver;
- int buffer_idx;
- unsigned int nr_events;
- enum oe_flush last_flush_type;
- u32 nr_unordered_events;
- bool copy_on_queue;
+ u64 last_flush;
+ u64 next_flush;
+ u64 max_timestamp;
+ u64 max_alloc_size;
+ u64 cur_alloc_size;
+ struct list_head events;
+ struct list_head cache;
+ struct list_head to_free;
+ struct ordered_events_buffer *buffer;
+ struct ordered_event *last;
+ ordered_events__deliver_t deliver;
+ int buffer_idx;
+ unsigned int nr_events;
+ enum oe_flush last_flush_type;
+ u32 nr_unordered_events;
+ bool copy_on_queue;
};
int ordered_events__queue(struct ordered_events *oe, union perf_event *event,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-10 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-08 22:33 [PATCH v2] perf ordered_events: fix crash in free_dup_event() Stephane Eranian
2018-08-09 8:07 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-08-10 8:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-08-10 11:54 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2018-08-13 13:04 ` [PATCH] perf tools: Add struct ordered_events_buffer layer Jiri Olsa
2018-08-14 7:14 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-08-15 8:48 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-08-27 9:28 ` [PATCHv2] " Jiri Olsa
2018-08-27 11:07 ` Namhyung Kim
2018-08-27 15:24 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-08-27 17:05 ` [PATCHv3] " Jiri Olsa
2018-09-02 14:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-09-04 2:37 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-09-06 13:28 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-09-06 15:04 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180810115431.GA4162@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.