Re: [PATCH 01/14] arm64: dts: renesas: Cut redundant <SoC> in *<SoC>-<SoC>ulcb*.dts

[Eugeniu Rosca <roscaeugeniu@gmail.com>]

Hi Simon, Laurent,

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 01:22:49PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 01:35:08PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
[snip]
> > The naming convention is roughly <soc>-<board>.dts. For instance, in r8a7795-
> > h3ulcb.dts, the SoC is R8A7795 and the board "H3 ULCB". With the proposed 
> > rename we would break that convention.
> > 
> > However, the name ULCB itself (which stands for Ultra Low Cost Board) might 
> > already not follow the naming convention, as the boards are officially called 
> > R-Car Starter Kit (Pro and Premier). The V3M and V3H "low-cost" boards reflect 
> > that properly, with their .dts files named r8a77970-v3msk.dts and r8a77970-
> > v3hsk.dts respectively.
> > 
> > I'm not opposed to simplifying the file names, but I think we should then 
> > decide on a simpler convention. In particular the H3/M3 and V3 .dts files 
> > should in my opinion follow the same convention.
> > 
> > I'll now let others comment on this as I don't have such a strong opinion on 
> > this topic.
> 
> At this point I'd prefer to keep the current, albeit imperfect scheme,
> and avoid churn.

To be able to push a v2, I interpret this input as using below strings
for the newly supported M3-N Starter Kit board:
 - r8a77965-m3nulcb.dts and r8a77965-m3nulcb-kf.dts for device tree sources
 - "renesas,m3nulcb" for compatible string
 - M3NULCB for board name in the shmobile.txt DT bindings

I still think there is some redundancy in this naming scheme, but I can
live with that.

Thanks,
Eugeniu.