All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/6] package/Makefile.in: Use gcc spec files for PIE build flags
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2018 17:07:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180812170703.06be88df@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANQCQpam_kU+CdNETW7g9N49MgRhRj6tEQNc8qayzGdJiTWC_A@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

On Sun, 12 Aug 2018 07:49:19 -0500, Matthew Weber wrote:

> > So I don't think we need to wrap "ld", as ld shouldn't be used
> > directly. The only packages that should use "ld" directly are things
> > like the Linux kernel or bootloaders.
> 
> The current hardening approach is trying to cover the cases where
> packages are still using ld directly and have other incompatible flags
> set (static/shared/r).  I don't have the exact list but I believe
> busybox is even one of those and others like valgrind, boost, etc who
> use the "shared" flag and adding "pie" causes a compile failure.  So
> we do still need to cover the ld case or go patch packages.

I find it weird that those packages are using "ld" directly, because if
that's the case, we would have build failures on some mips64
configurations.

> What I could do is move the cc1 spec file conditional add of PIE into
> the wrapper.  Then leave the LDFLAGS as we have them and the
> associated spec file that does a conditional add of "pie".  This would
> prevent us from wrapping the ld tool and keep the existing wrapper
> approach consistent.

If we really need to do some custom logic around ld, then I believe I'd
prefer to have a wrapper for it as well, to keep things consistent. But
of course, Arnout's opinion on the matter would be welcome.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-12 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-11 14:31 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/6] Hardening Flag Bugfix/Enhancement Matt Weber
2018-07-11 14:31 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/6] package/Makefile.in: Do not use CPPFLAGS for hardening options Matt Weber
2018-07-11 21:14   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-08-10 20:31   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-07-11 14:31 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/6] package/Makefile.in: Add missing options to LDFLAGS for full RELRO build Matt Weber
2018-07-11 21:26   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-08-10 20:33   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-07-11 14:31 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/6] package/Makefile.in: Use gcc spec files for PIE build flags Matt Weber
2018-07-11 21:44   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-07-11 23:17     ` Matthew Weber
2018-07-13  9:39       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-07-13 12:31         ` Matthew Weber
2018-07-19  9:49       ` Sørensen, Stefan
2018-07-19 12:58         ` Matthew Weber
2018-07-19 13:10           ` Sørensen, Stefan
2018-08-07 17:02             ` Matthew Weber
2018-08-07 17:20               ` Matthew Weber
2018-08-08  7:24   ` Jan Kundrát
2018-08-08  8:35     ` Jan Kundrát
2018-08-08 11:38       ` Matthew Weber
2018-08-09 14:32       ` Matthew Weber
2018-08-28 20:07       ` Matthew Weber
2018-08-10 20:50   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-11  0:42     ` Matthew Weber
2018-08-11 10:29       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-12  3:55         ` Matthew Weber
2018-08-12  7:41           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-12 12:49             ` Matthew Weber
2018-08-12 15:07               ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-08-12 21:20                 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-07-11 14:31 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/6] support/testing: runtest proxy support Matt Weber
2018-07-11 21:47   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2018-08-10 20:51   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-11  0:30     ` Matthew Weber
2018-08-11  1:03       ` Matthew Weber
2018-07-11 14:31 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 5/6] package/checksec: new package Matt Weber
2018-08-10 20:58   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-11  0:57     ` Matthew Weber
2018-08-11 10:30       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-07-11 14:31 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 6/6] support/testing/tests/core: SSP & hardening flags Matt Weber
2018-07-16  1:32   ` Ricardo Martincoski
2018-07-17  2:53     ` Matthew Weber
2018-07-17  3:05       ` Matthew Weber
2018-07-12 11:44 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/6] Hardening Flag Bugfix/Enhancement Matthew Weber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180812170703.06be88df@windsurf \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.