All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, liu.song.a23@gmail.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
	namhyung@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, alexis.berlemont@gmail.com,
	naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, ralf@linux-mips.org, paul.burton@mips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/6] Uprobes: Support SDT markers having reference count (semaphore)
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:23:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180813112324.GA28360@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180813100327.GF44470@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 08/13, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>
> > +
> > +static int delayed_uprobe_add(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm)
> > +{
> > +	struct delayed_uprobe *du;
> > +
> > +	if (delayed_uprobe_check(uprobe, mm))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	du = kzalloc(sizeof(*du), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!du)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	du->uprobe = uprobe;
> > +	du->mm = mm;
> > +	list_add(&du->list, &delayed_uprobe_list);
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
>
> Should we keep the delayed uprobe list per mm?
> That way we could avoid the global mutex lock.
> And the list to traverse would also be small.

Plus uprobe_mmap() could simply check list_empty(mm->delayed_list) before
the costly delayed_uprobe_install().

Yes, I mentioned this too. But then I suggested to not do this in the initial
version to make it more simple.

Hopefully we can do this later, but note that this conflicts with the change
in put_uprobe() you commented below.

> >  static void put_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
> >  {
> > -	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&uprobe->ref))
> > +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&uprobe->ref)) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * If application munmap(exec_vma) before uprobe_unregister()
> > +		 * gets called, we don't get a chance to remove uprobe from
> > +		 * delayed_uprobe_list in remove_breakpoint(). Do it here.
> > +		 */
> > +		delayed_uprobe_remove(uprobe, NULL);
>
> I am not getting this part. If unmap happens before unregister,
> why cant we use uprobe_munmap?

How? I mean what exactly can we do in uprobe_munmap() ? Firstly, we will need
to restore build_probe_list/list_for_each_entry_safe(pending_list) in
uprobe_munmap() and this is not nice performance-wise. Then what?

We don't even know if the caller is actually munmap(), it can be vma_adjust()
and in the latter case we can't do delayed_uprobe_remove(uprobe, mm).

Perhaps we can use uprobe_munmap() to cleanup the delayed_uprobe_list, but this
doesn't look simple to me.

In fact I think that we should simply kill uprobe_munmap().

Oleg.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: oleg@redhat.com (Oleg Nesterov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 3/6] Uprobes: Support SDT markers having reference count (semaphore)
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:23:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180813112324.GA28360@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180813100327.GF44470@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 08/13, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>
> > +
> > +static int delayed_uprobe_add(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm)
> > +{
> > +	struct delayed_uprobe *du;
> > +
> > +	if (delayed_uprobe_check(uprobe, mm))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	du = kzalloc(sizeof(*du), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!du)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	du->uprobe = uprobe;
> > +	du->mm = mm;
> > +	list_add(&du->list, &delayed_uprobe_list);
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
>
> Should we keep the delayed uprobe list per mm?
> That way we could avoid the global mutex lock.
> And the list to traverse would also be small.

Plus uprobe_mmap() could simply check list_empty(mm->delayed_list) before
the costly delayed_uprobe_install().

Yes, I mentioned this too. But then I suggested to not do this in the initial
version to make it more simple.

Hopefully we can do this later, but note that this conflicts with the change
in put_uprobe() you commented below.

> >  static void put_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
> >  {
> > -	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&uprobe->ref))
> > +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&uprobe->ref)) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * If application munmap(exec_vma) before uprobe_unregister()
> > +		 * gets called, we don't get a chance to remove uprobe from
> > +		 * delayed_uprobe_list in remove_breakpoint(). Do it here.
> > +		 */
> > +		delayed_uprobe_remove(uprobe, NULL);
>
> I am not getting this part. If unmap happens before unregister,
> why cant we use uprobe_munmap?

How? I mean what exactly can we do in uprobe_munmap() ? Firstly, we will need
to restore build_probe_list/list_for_each_entry_safe(pending_list) in
uprobe_munmap() and this is not nice performance-wise. Then what?

We don't even know if the caller is actually munmap(), it can be vma_adjust()
and in the latter case we can't do delayed_uprobe_remove(uprobe, mm).

Perhaps we can use uprobe_munmap() to cleanup the delayed_uprobe_list, but this
doesn't look simple to me.

In fact I think that we should simply kill uprobe_munmap().

Oleg.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-13 11:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-09  4:18 [PATCH v8 0/6] Uprobes: Support SDT markers having reference count (semaphore) Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-09  4:18 ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-09  4:18 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] Uprobes: Simplify uprobe_register() body Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-09  4:18   ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-11  8:00   ` Song Liu
2018-08-11  8:00     ` Song Liu
2018-08-13  8:56   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-13  8:56     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-14  0:07     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-14  0:07       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-09  4:18 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] Uprobe: Additional argument arch_uprobe to uprobe_write_opcode() Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-09  4:18   ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-11  8:01   ` Song Liu
2018-08-11  8:01     ` Song Liu
2018-08-13  8:51   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-13  8:51     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-09  4:18 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] Uprobes: Support SDT markers having reference count (semaphore) Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-09  4:18   ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-09 14:38   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-09 14:38     ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-10 19:58     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-10 19:58       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-11  6:14       ` Song Liu
2018-08-11  6:14         ` Song Liu
2018-08-14  0:01         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-14  0:01           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-14  0:05           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-14  0:05             ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-11  7:57   ` Song Liu
2018-08-11  7:57     ` Song Liu
2018-08-11 15:37     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-11 15:37       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-13  5:47     ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-13  5:47       ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-13  7:38       ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-13  7:38         ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-13 11:50       ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-13 11:50         ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-13 13:01         ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-13 13:01           ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-13 13:17           ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-13 13:17             ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-13 14:26             ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-13 14:26               ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-13 14:51             ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-13 14:51               ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-13 17:12             ` Song Liu
2018-08-13 17:12               ` Song Liu
2018-08-14  4:37               ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-14  4:37                 ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-14 16:35                 ` Song Liu
2018-08-14 16:35                   ` Song Liu
2018-08-14  0:03         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-14  0:03           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-13 16:50       ` Song Liu
2018-08-13 16:50         ` Song Liu
2018-08-13 10:03   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-13 10:03     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-13 11:23     ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2018-08-13 11:23       ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-14  8:56   ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-14  8:56     ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-09  4:18 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] Uprobes/sdt: Prevent multiple reference counter for same uprobe Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-09  4:18   ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-11  8:04   ` Song Liu
2018-08-11  8:04     ` Song Liu
2018-08-13  8:50   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-13  8:50     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-09  4:18 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] trace_uprobe/sdt: " Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-09  4:18   ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-11  8:12   ` Song Liu
2018-08-11  8:12     ` Song Liu
2018-08-13  8:19     ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-13  8:19       ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-13  8:49       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-13  8:49         ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-13 16:27         ` Song Liu
2018-08-13 16:27           ` Song Liu
2018-08-13  8:48   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-13  8:48     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-09  4:18 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] perf probe: Support SDT markers having reference counter (semaphore) Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-09  4:18   ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-13 16:55 ` [PATCH v8 0/6] Uprobes: Support SDT markers having reference count (semaphore) Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-13 16:55   ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180813112324.GA28360@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexis.berlemont@gmail.com \
    --cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=liu.song.a23@gmail.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.