From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59015) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fpD6u-0007lR-0Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 09:42:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fpD6t-0000lL-7D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 09:42:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 15:42:06 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20180813134206.GF4323@localhost.localdomain> References: <20180813023958.5352-1-famz@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180813023958.5352-1-famz@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] file-posix: Skip effectiveless OFD lock operations List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Fam Zheng Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz , qemu-block@nongnu.org Am 13.08.2018 um 04:39 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben: > If we know we've already locked the bytes, don't do it again; similarly > don't unlock a byte if we haven't locked it. This doesn't change the > behavior, but fixes a corner case explained below. > > Libvirt had an error handling bug that an image can get its (ownership, > file mode, SELinux) permissions changed (RHBZ 1584982) by mistake behind > QEMU. Specifically, an image in use by Libvirt VM has: > > $ ls -lhZ b.img > -rw-r--r--. qemu qemu system_u:object_r:svirt_image_t:s0:c600,c690 b.img > > Trying to attach it a second time won't work because of image locking. > And after the error, it becomes: > > $ ls -lhZ b.img > -rw-r--r--. root root system_u:object_r:virt_image_t:s0 b.img > > Then, we won't be able to do OFD lock operations with the existing fd. > In other words, the code such as in blk_detach_dev: > > blk_set_perm(blk, 0, BLK_PERM_ALL, &error_abort); > > can abort() QEMU, out of environmental changes. > > This patch is an easy fix to this and the change is regardlessly > reasonable, so do it. > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng Thanks, applied to the block branch. Kevin