From: Tomas Bortoli <tomasbortoli@gmail.com>
To: asmadeus@codewreck.org, ericvh@gmail.com, rminnich@sandia.gov,
lucho@ionkov.net
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzkaller@googlegroups.com,
Tomas Bortoli <tomasbortoli@gmail.com>,
Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@cea.fr>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] 9p: Add refcount to p9_req_t
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 19:43:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180814174342.11068-2-tomasbortoli@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180814174342.11068-1-tomasbortoli@gmail.com>
To avoid use-after-free(s), use a refcount to keep track of the
usable references to any instantiated struct p9_req_t.
This commit adds p9_req_put(), p9_req_get() and p9_req_try_get() as
wrappers to kref_put(), kref_get() and kref_get_unless_zero().
These are used by the client and the transports to keep track of
valid requests' references.
p9_free_req() is added back and used as callback by kref_put().
Add SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU as it ensures that the memory freed by
kmem_cache_free() will not be reused for another type until the rcu
synchronisation period is over, so an address gotten under rcu read
lock is safe to inc_ref() without corrupting random memory while
the lock is held.
Co-developed-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@cea.fr>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Bortoli <tomasbortoli@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+467050c1ce275af2a5b8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@cea.fr>
---
include/net/9p/client.h | 14 +++++++++++++
net/9p/client.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
net/9p/trans_fd.c | 11 +++++++++-
net/9p/trans_rdma.c | 1 +
4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/9p/client.h b/include/net/9p/client.h
index 735f3979d559..947a570307a6 100644
--- a/include/net/9p/client.h
+++ b/include/net/9p/client.h
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ enum p9_req_status_t {
struct p9_req_t {
int status;
int t_err;
+ struct kref refcount;
wait_queue_head_t wq;
struct p9_fcall tc;
struct p9_fcall rc;
@@ -233,6 +234,19 @@ int p9_client_lock_dotl(struct p9_fid *fid, struct p9_flock *flock, u8 *status);
int p9_client_getlock_dotl(struct p9_fid *fid, struct p9_getlock *fl);
void p9_fcall_fini(struct p9_fcall *fc);
struct p9_req_t *p9_tag_lookup(struct p9_client *, u16);
+
+static inline void p9_req_get(struct p9_req_t *r)
+{
+ kref_get(&r->refcount);
+}
+
+static inline int p9_req_try_get(struct p9_req_t *r)
+{
+ return kref_get_unless_zero(&r->refcount);
+}
+
+int p9_req_put(struct p9_req_t *r);
+
void p9_client_cb(struct p9_client *c, struct p9_req_t *req, int status);
int p9_parse_header(struct p9_fcall *, int32_t *, int8_t *, int16_t *, int);
diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c
index 7942c0bfcc5b..c9bb5d41afa4 100644
--- a/net/9p/client.c
+++ b/net/9p/client.c
@@ -310,6 +310,18 @@ p9_tag_alloc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type, unsigned int max_size)
if (tag < 0)
goto free;
+ /* Init ref to two because in the general case there is one ref
+ * that is put asynchronously by a writer thread, one ref
+ * temporarily given by p9_tag_lookup and put by p9_client_cb
+ * in the recv thread, and one ref put by p9_tag_remove in the
+ * main thread. The only exception is virtio that does not use
+ * p9_tag_lookup but does not have a writer thread either
+ * (the write happens synchronously in the request/zc_request
+ * callback), so p9_client_cb eats the second ref there
+ * as the pointer is duplicated directly by virtqueue_add_sgs()
+ */
+ refcount_set(&req->refcount.refcount, 2);
+
return req;
free:
@@ -333,10 +345,21 @@ struct p9_req_t *p9_tag_lookup(struct p9_client *c, u16 tag)
struct p9_req_t *req;
rcu_read_lock();
+again:
req = idr_find(&c->reqs, tag);
- /* There's no refcount on the req; a malicious server could cause
- * us to dereference a NULL pointer
- */
+ if (req) {
+ /* We have to be careful with the req found under rcu_read_lock
+ * Thanks to SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU we can safely try to get the
+ * ref again without corrupting other data, then check again
+ * that the tag matches once we have the ref
+ */
+ if (!p9_req_try_get(req))
+ goto again;
+ if (req->tc.tag != tag) {
+ p9_req_put(req);
+ goto again;
+ }
+ }
rcu_read_unlock();
return req;
@@ -350,7 +373,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(p9_tag_lookup);
*
* Context: Any context.
*/
-static void p9_tag_remove(struct p9_client *c, struct p9_req_t *r)
+static int p9_tag_remove(struct p9_client *c, struct p9_req_t *r)
{
unsigned long flags;
u16 tag = r->tc.tag;
@@ -359,11 +382,23 @@ static void p9_tag_remove(struct p9_client *c, struct p9_req_t *r)
spin_lock_irqsave(&c->lock, flags);
idr_remove(&c->reqs, tag);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&c->lock, flags);
+ return p9_req_put(r);
+}
+
+static void p9_req_free(struct kref *ref)
+{
+ struct p9_req_t *r = container_of(ref, struct p9_req_t, refcount);
p9_fcall_fini(&r->tc);
p9_fcall_fini(&r->rc);
kmem_cache_free(p9_req_cache, r);
}
+int p9_req_put(struct p9_req_t *r)
+{
+ return kref_put(&r->refcount, p9_req_free);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(p9_req_put);
+
/**
* p9_tag_cleanup - cleans up tags structure and reclaims resources
* @c: v9fs client struct
@@ -379,7 +414,9 @@ static void p9_tag_cleanup(struct p9_client *c)
rcu_read_lock();
idr_for_each_entry(&c->reqs, req, id) {
pr_info("Tag %d still in use\n", id);
- p9_tag_remove(c, req);
+ if (p9_tag_remove(c, req) == 0)
+ pr_warn("Packet with tag %d has still references",
+ req->tc.tag);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -403,6 +440,7 @@ void p9_client_cb(struct p9_client *c, struct p9_req_t *req, int status)
wake_up(&req->wq);
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_MUX, "wakeup: %d\n", req->tc.tag);
+ p9_req_put(req);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(p9_client_cb);
@@ -682,6 +720,8 @@ static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_prepare_req(struct p9_client *c,
return req;
reterr:
p9_tag_remove(c, req);
+ /* We have to put also the 2nd reference as it won't be used */
+ p9_req_put(req);
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
@@ -716,6 +756,8 @@ p9_client_rpc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type, const char *fmt, ...)
err = c->trans_mod->request(c, req);
if (err < 0) {
+ /* write won't happen */
+ p9_req_put(req);
if (err != -ERESTARTSYS && err != -EFAULT)
c->status = Disconnected;
goto recalc_sigpending;
@@ -2241,7 +2283,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(p9_client_readlink);
int __init p9_client_init(void)
{
- p9_req_cache = KMEM_CACHE(p9_req_t, 0);
+ p9_req_cache = KMEM_CACHE(p9_req_t, SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU);
return p9_req_cache ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
}
diff --git a/net/9p/trans_fd.c b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
index 20f46f13fe83..686e24e355d0 100644
--- a/net/9p/trans_fd.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
@@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ struct p9_conn {
struct list_head req_list;
struct list_head unsent_req_list;
struct p9_req_t *req;
+ struct p9_req_t *wreq;
char tmp_buf[7];
struct p9_fcall rc;
int wpos;
@@ -383,6 +384,7 @@ static void p9_read_work(struct work_struct *work)
m->rc.sdata = NULL;
m->rc.offset = 0;
m->rc.capacity = 0;
+ p9_req_put(m->req);
m->req = NULL;
}
@@ -472,6 +474,8 @@ static void p9_write_work(struct work_struct *work)
m->wbuf = req->tc.sdata;
m->wsize = req->tc.size;
m->wpos = 0;
+ p9_req_get(req);
+ m->wreq = req;
spin_unlock(&m->client->lock);
}
@@ -492,8 +496,11 @@ static void p9_write_work(struct work_struct *work)
}
m->wpos += err;
- if (m->wpos == m->wsize)
+ if (m->wpos == m->wsize) {
m->wpos = m->wsize = 0;
+ p9_req_put(m->wreq);
+ m->wreq = NULL;
+ }
end_clear:
clear_bit(Wworksched, &m->wsched);
@@ -694,6 +701,7 @@ static int p9_fd_cancel(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req)
if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_UNSENT) {
list_del(&req->req_list);
req->status = REQ_STATUS_FLSHD;
+ p9_req_put(req);
ret = 0;
}
spin_unlock(&client->lock);
@@ -711,6 +719,7 @@ static int p9_fd_cancelled(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req)
spin_lock(&client->lock);
list_del(&req->req_list);
spin_unlock(&client->lock);
+ p9_req_put(req);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/net/9p/trans_rdma.c b/net/9p/trans_rdma.c
index c60655c90c9e..8cff368a11e3 100644
--- a/net/9p/trans_rdma.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_rdma.c
@@ -365,6 +365,7 @@ send_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
c->busa, c->req->tc.size,
DMA_TO_DEVICE);
up(&rdma->sq_sem);
+ p9_req_put(c->req);
kfree(c);
}
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-14 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-14 17:43 [PATCH v2 1/2] WIP: 9p: rename p9_free_req() function Tomas Bortoli
2018-08-14 17:43 ` Tomas Bortoli [this message]
2018-08-27 23:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] 9p: Add refcount to p9_req_t Dominique Martinet
2018-08-28 1:07 ` [V9fs-developer] " piaojun
2018-08-28 1:57 ` Dominique Martinet
2018-08-29 4:43 ` Dominique Martinet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180814174342.11068-2-tomasbortoli@gmail.com \
--to=tomasbortoli@gmail.com \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dominique.martinet@cea.fr \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rminnich@sandia.gov \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.