All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Convert rcu_state.ofl_lock to raw_spinlock_t
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 09:19:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180815161943.GN24813@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1534347845.21000.0.camel@gmx.de>

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 05:44:05PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
> 1e64b15a4b10 ("rcu: Fix grace-period hangs due to race with CPU offline")
> added spinlock_t ofl_lock to the rcu_state structure, then takes it with
> preemption disabled during CPU offline, giving RT sleeping lock heartburn.
> 
> Convert it to raw_spinlock_t.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>

Good catch, applied and started testing.

I had to hand-apply this one due to the RCU flavor consolidation churn.
Let's just say that your patch is the 160th in -rcu slated for the next
merge window, putting us about 30% of the way to the Greg KH criterion.  ;-)
(That said, about 25 of those patches are LKMM rather than RCU.)

So please see below for my adaptation of your patch.  Please let me know
if I messed anything up.

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit f5bc811f274bb5ff6da5f84f6928d00711c28f09
Author: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Date:   Wed Aug 15 09:05:29 2018 -0700

    rcu: Convert rcu_state.ofl_lock to raw_spinlock_t
    
    1e64b15a4b10 ("rcu: Fix grace-period hangs due to race with CPU offline")
    added spinlock_t ofl_lock to the rcu_state structure, then takes it with
    preemption disabled during CPU offline, which gives the -rt patchset's
    sleeping spinlock heartburn.
    
    This commit therefore converts ->ofl_lock to raw_spinlock_t.
    
    Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
    Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index bf016ff9f873..7f7008dd9c34 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ struct rcu_state rcu_state = {
 	.abbr = RCU_ABBR,
 	.exp_mutex = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(rcu_state.exp_mutex),
 	.exp_wake_mutex = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(rcu_state.exp_wake_mutex),
-	.ofl_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(rcu_state.ofl_lock),
+	.ofl_lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(rcu_state.ofl_lock),
 };
 
 /* Dump rcu_node combining tree at boot to verify correct setup. */
@@ -1775,13 +1775,13 @@ static bool rcu_gp_init(void)
 	 */
 	rcu_state.gp_state = RCU_GP_ONOFF;
 	rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rnp) {
-		spin_lock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
+		raw_spin_lock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
 		raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
 		if (rnp->qsmaskinit == rnp->qsmaskinitnext &&
 		    !rnp->wait_blkd_tasks) {
 			/* Nothing to do on this leaf rcu_node structure. */
 			raw_spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
-			spin_unlock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
+			raw_spin_unlock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -1817,7 +1817,7 @@ static bool rcu_gp_init(void)
 		}
 
 		raw_spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
-		spin_unlock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
+		raw_spin_unlock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
 	}
 	rcu_gp_slow(gp_preinit_delay); /* Races with CPU hotplug. */
 
@@ -3376,7 +3376,7 @@ void rcu_report_dead(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	/* Remove outgoing CPU from mask in the leaf rcu_node structure. */
 	mask = rdp->grpmask;
-	spin_lock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
+	raw_spin_lock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags); /* Enforce GP memory-order guarantee. */
 	rdp->rcu_ofl_gp_seq = READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_seq);
 	rdp->rcu_ofl_gp_flags = READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_flags);
@@ -3387,7 +3387,7 @@ void rcu_report_dead(unsigned int cpu)
 	}
 	rnp->qsmaskinitnext &= ~mask;
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
-	spin_unlock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
 
 	per_cpu(rcu_cpu_started, cpu) = 0;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index bfbf97a1c29d..703e19ff532d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ struct rcu_state {
 	const char *name;			/* Name of structure. */
 	char abbr;				/* Abbreviated name. */
 
-	spinlock_t ofl_lock ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
+	raw_spinlock_t ofl_lock ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
 						/* Synchronize offline with */
 						/*  GP pre-initialization. */
 };


      reply	other threads:[~2018-08-15 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-15 15:44 [PATCH] rcu: Convert rcu_state.ofl_lock to raw_spinlock_t Mike Galbraith
2018-08-15 16:19 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180815161943.GN24813@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.