All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: apm: mark proc_apm_show as __maybe_unused
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 08:43:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180817064344.GC10811@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180814091904.2186262-1-arnd@arndb.de>

On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:18:45AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A new build error appeared with CONFIG_PROC_FS disabled:
> 
> arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c:1643:12: error: 'proc_apm_show' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> 
> This marks the function as __maybe_unused to let the compiler drop
> it silently.
> 
> Fixes: 3f3942aca6da ("proc: introduce proc_create_single{,_data}")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

I have to admit I actually prefer ifdefs over magic __maybe_unused
annotations.  But otherwise this looks correct to me, same for the
other patch.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-17  6:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-14  9:18 [PATCH 1/2] x86: apm: mark proc_apm_show as __maybe_unused Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-14  9:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: rpc: mark ecard_devices_proc_show " Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-14  9:18   ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-17  6:43 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-08-20 15:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: apm: mark proc_apm_show " Thomas Gleixner
2018-08-20 16:11   ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180817064344.GC10811@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.