From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (146.0.238.70:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 20 Aug 2018 17:20:17 -0000 Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1frnqh-00020Y-DY for speck@linutronix.de; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 19:20:16 +0200 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w7KHJ3XA041170 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:20:09 GMT Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2kxavtfqqr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:20:08 +0000 Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w7KHK3BG031407 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:20:03 GMT Received: from abhmp0003.oracle.com (abhmp0003.oracle.com [141.146.116.9]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w7KHK3kw030110 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:20:03 GMT Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:20:02 -0400 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: [MODERATED] Re: L1TF counter Message-ID: <20180820172002.GA31606@char.us.oracle.com> References: <20180820165251.GA29877@char.us.oracle.com> <6c2198e5-50a2-0f36-caf2-d0a2b26812eb@citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6c2198e5-50a2-0f36-caf2-d0a2b26812eb@citrix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 06:11:26PM +0100, speck for Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 20/08/2018 17:52, speck for Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > Hey, > > > > Intel has mentioned that they are working on a new microcode which can > > be used to detect L1TF conditions. > > > > Anyone is working on it? I was thinking to start crafting patches > > based on the description of the MSR and post them here for review. > > > > But if someone is already busy with that I would rather review them :-) > > > > There are no details currently available.  Intel are planning to get us > production signed alpha builds of microcode as soon as they've worked > out why the latest build isn't working. Sure. But the PDF is there. Or are you saying it is pointless as they may change the PDF again? > > ~Andrew >