From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kobject: Access kobject name with caution if state is not initialized
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 23:46:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180821064652.GB33230@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKdAkRT3OfvcvHdNC4Jn1RfM76TUHohcXVFDA0QfsSPdTW348Q@mail.gmail.com>
* Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> [2018-08-20 12:33:50]:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:22 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:39:47PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > Lots of stupid modules can do dumb things. Just don't do that. The
> > kernel is not built to keep you from doing stupid things in kernel code
> > :)
> >
> > So I fail to see why this patch is needed. What in-kernel code path is
> > trying to print a kobject's name before it is initialized? Why not fix
> > that obvious bug instead of forcing the kernel core to protect from
> > stupid code?
>
> Kay decided to add some guards in:
>
> commit 0f4dafc0563c6c49e17fe14b3f5f356e4c4b8806
> Author: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
> Date: Wed Dec 19 01:40:42 2007 +0100
>
> Kobject: auto-cleanup on final unref
> ...
>
> + if (!kobj->state_initialized) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "kobject '%s' (%p): tried to add an "
> + "uninitialized object, something is seriously wrong.\n",
> + kobject_name(kobj), kobj);
> + dump_stack();
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Given that we have dump_stack() we can probably simply drop
> kobject_name(kobj) instead of building even more elaborate checks. Or
> just drop the whole check. Adding kobjects is somewhat uncommon
> operation, plus "gabage in, garbage out".
>
Dropping the kobject_name(kobj) should also be okay.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-21 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-20 17:09 [PATCH] kobject: Access kobject name with caution if state is not initialized Srikar Dronamraju
2018-08-20 19:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-08-20 19:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-08-21 6:46 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2018-08-21 4:58 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180821064652.GB33230@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.