From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@techadventures.net>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: mhocko@suse.com, vbabka@suse.cz, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
yasu.isimatu@gmail.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
david@redhat.com, Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Refactoring for remove_memory_section/unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 18:21:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180821162122.GA10300@techadventures.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180817090017.17610-1-osalvador@techadventures.net>
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:00:13AM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
>
> v3 -> v4:
> - Make nodemask_t a stack variable
> - Added Reviewed-by from David and Pavel
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - NODEMASK_FREE can deal with NULL pointers, so do not
> make it conditional (by David).
> - Split up node_online's check patch (David's suggestion)
> - Added Reviewed-by from Andrew and David
> - Fix checkpath.pl warnings
Andrew, will you pick up this patchset?
I saw that v3 was removed from the -mm tree because it was about
to be updated with a new version (this one), but I am not sure if
anything wrong happened.
Thanks
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-21 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-17 9:00 [PATCH v4 0/4] Refactoring for remove_memory_section/unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes Oscar Salvador
2018-08-17 9:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] mm/memory-hotplug: Drop unused args from remove_memory_section Oscar Salvador
2018-08-17 9:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Drop mem_blk check from unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes Oscar Salvador
2018-08-17 9:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Define nodemask_t as a stack variable Oscar Salvador
2018-08-17 9:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-28 11:54 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-28 14:04 ` Pasha Tatashin
2018-08-17 9:00 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Drop node_online check in unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes Oscar Salvador
2018-08-21 16:21 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2018-08-21 20:43 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Refactoring for remove_memory_section/unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes Andrew Morton
2018-08-29 20:50 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180821162122.GA10300@techadventures.net \
--to=osalvador@techadventures.net \
--cc=Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.