From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: luto@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de,
will.deacon@arm.com, riel@surriel.com, jannh@google.com,
ascannell@google.com, dave.hansen@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support invalidating TLB caches for RCU_TABLE_FREE
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:55:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180822155527.GF24124@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180822154046.823850812@infradead.org>
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 05:30:15PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> ARM
> which later used this put an explicit TLB invalidate in their
> __p*_free_tlb() functions, and PowerPC-radix followed that example.
> +/*
> + * If we want tlb_remove_table() to imply TLB invalidates.
> + */
> +static inline void tlb_table_invalidate(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_INVALIDATE
> + /*
> + * Invalidate page-table caches used by hardware walkers. Then we still
> + * need to RCU-sched wait while freeing the pages because software
> + * walkers can still be in-flight.
> + */
> + __tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb);
> +#endif
> +}
Nick, Will is already looking at using this to remove the synchronous
invalidation from __p*_free_tlb() for ARM, could you have a look to see
if PowerPC-radix could benefit from that too?
Basically, using a patch like the below, would give your tlb_flush()
information on if tables were removed or not.
---
--- a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
@@ -96,12 +96,22 @@ struct mmu_gather {
#endif
unsigned long start;
unsigned long end;
- /* we are in the middle of an operation to clear
- * a full mm and can make some optimizations */
- unsigned int fullmm : 1,
- /* we have performed an operation which
- * requires a complete flush of the tlb */
- need_flush_all : 1;
+ /*
+ * we are in the middle of an operation to clear
+ * a full mm and can make some optimizations
+ */
+ unsigned int fullmm : 1;
+
+ /*
+ * we have performed an operation which
+ * requires a complete flush of the tlb
+ */
+ unsigned int need_flush_all : 1;
+
+ /*
+ * we have removed page directories
+ */
+ unsigned int freed_tables : 1;
struct mmu_gather_batch *active;
struct mmu_gather_batch local;
@@ -136,6 +146,7 @@ static inline void __tlb_reset_range(str
tlb->start = TASK_SIZE;
tlb->end = 0;
}
+ tlb->freed_tables = 0;
}
static inline void tlb_remove_page_size(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
@@ -269,6 +280,7 @@ static inline void tlb_remove_check_page
#define pte_free_tlb(tlb, ptep, address) \
do { \
__tlb_adjust_range(tlb, address, PAGE_SIZE); \
+ tlb->freed_tables = 1; \
__pte_free_tlb(tlb, ptep, address); \
} while (0)
#endif
@@ -276,7 +288,8 @@ static inline void tlb_remove_check_page
#ifndef pmd_free_tlb
#define pmd_free_tlb(tlb, pmdp, address) \
do { \
- __tlb_adjust_range(tlb, address, PAGE_SIZE); \
+ __tlb_adjust_range(tlb, address, PAGE_SIZE); \
+ tlb->freed_tables = 1; \
__pmd_free_tlb(tlb, pmdp, address); \
} while (0)
#endif
@@ -286,6 +299,7 @@ static inline void tlb_remove_check_page
#define pud_free_tlb(tlb, pudp, address) \
do { \
__tlb_adjust_range(tlb, address, PAGE_SIZE); \
+ tlb->freed_tables = 1; \
__pud_free_tlb(tlb, pudp, address); \
} while (0)
#endif
@@ -295,7 +309,8 @@ static inline void tlb_remove_check_page
#ifndef p4d_free_tlb
#define p4d_free_tlb(tlb, pudp, address) \
do { \
- __tlb_adjust_range(tlb, address, PAGE_SIZE); \
+ __tlb_adjust_range(tlb, address, PAGE_SIZE); \
+ tlb->freed_tables = 1; \
__p4d_free_tlb(tlb, pudp, address); \
} while (0)
#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-22 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-22 15:30 [PATCH 0/4] x86: TLB invalidate fixes Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-22 15:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/mm/tlb: Revert the recent lazy TLB patches Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-22 21:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-22 22:11 ` Rik van Riel
2018-08-22 15:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/tlb: Remove tlb_remove_table() non-concurrent condition Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-23 3:31 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23 3:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 3:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 4:16 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23 4:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 5:15 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-24 8:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-23 13:40 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-22 15:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support invalidating TLB caches for RCU_TABLE_FREE Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-22 15:55 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-08-23 3:45 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23 3:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 4:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23 5:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 5:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23 4:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-23 5:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 5:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 6:48 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-08-23 5:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-23 6:15 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23 13:39 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-24 8:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-24 11:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-24 11:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-27 5:00 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-27 7:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-27 8:04 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-27 8:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-27 8:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-27 8:54 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-27 9:02 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-27 22:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-27 13:36 ` Rik van Riel
2018-08-27 14:29 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-27 8:57 ` removig ia64, was: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support invalidating TLB caches for RCU_TABLE_FRE Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-27 8:57 ` removig ia64, was: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support invalidating TLB caches for RCU_TABLE_FREE Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-27 11:28 ` removig ia64, was: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support invalidating TLB caches for RCU_TABLE Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-27 11:28 ` removig ia64, was: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support invalidating TLB caches for RCU_TABLE_FREE Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-27 11:45 ` removig ia64, was: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support invalidating TLB caches for RCU_TABLE Jason Duerstock
2018-08-27 11:45 ` removig ia64, was: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support invalidating TLB caches for RCU_TABLE_FREE Jason Duerstock
2018-08-27 11:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-30 0:13 ` Vineet Gupta
2018-08-30 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-24 17:26 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-24 18:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-24 18:35 ` TLB flushes on fixmap changes Nadav Amit
2018-08-24 19:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-24 20:24 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-25 0:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-25 2:16 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-25 2:29 ` nadav.amit
2018-08-25 4:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-26 2:23 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-08-26 4:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-26 4:43 ` Kees Cook
2018-08-26 5:53 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-26 14:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-26 16:47 ` Kees Cook
2018-08-26 17:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-26 20:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-08-26 22:03 ` Kees Cook
2018-08-26 22:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-08-26 22:29 ` Jann Horn
2018-08-26 9:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-27 3:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-08-27 3:26 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 8:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-08-27 17:34 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 18:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-27 18:54 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 18:58 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-27 19:10 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 19:43 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 19:58 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-27 20:16 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 21:55 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 22:32 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-27 22:54 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 23:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-28 8:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-08-28 17:33 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 8:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-27 9:39 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-08-27 9:55 ` Jann Horn
2018-08-26 22:48 ` Jann Horn
2018-08-24 8:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support invalidating TLB caches for RCU_TABLE_FREE Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-24 13:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-24 13:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-24 15:49 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-23 23:31 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-22 21:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 8:46 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-22 15:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/mm: Only use tlb_remove_table() for paravirt Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-22 22:12 ` Eduardo Valentin
2018-08-22 22:12 ` Eduardo Valentin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180822155527.GF24124@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ascannell@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.