From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 311E9E00718; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:38:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [198.47.19.142 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com (fllv0016.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.142]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14CEE003C1 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:38:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w7NHcEki100053; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:38:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1535045894; bh=X3ABmhHz44IUGfgxlfBsg9JJT72N0kPo8jJ/sY+hdjg=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=u2i0XcJ+SVDrl8NtPwXjkOnHoiYvLld88EVJMgNJSl33uuCblUWFUqMFWYMfo2U4P hvLElM+3KnIqAuvS2wsG63x/TmpWLIH/rOkoNAOtXGUVuIske5oH3U1NC15N0quhkJ a52zd+N5R5xZhIQ6z9ogGDRBuG3zHEHiBJvXObuE= Received: from DFLE103.ent.ti.com (dfle103.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.24]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w7NHcEW9005203; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:38:14 -0500 Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) by DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:38:13 -0500 Received: from dlep33.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.75) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1466.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:38:13 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep33.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w7NHcDrb024547; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:38:13 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:37:19 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Leo Meza Message-ID: <20180823173719.GV29422@beryl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Getting Started with meta-ti "rocko" and beaglebone black (BBB) X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 17:38:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline Check if your rootfs contains zImage and DTBs in /boot as well as modules in /lib/modules - I don't believe "minimal" image handles those automatically. Alternatively, don't use "minimal" image, but rather "base" or a more specialized image. -- Denys On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:18:49AM -0700, Leo Meza wrote: > I'm learning yocto and was able to easily boot my BBB with a > core-image-minimal system using the meta-yocto-bsp layer. However, when I > removed that layer and tried with meta-ti, I just see this on the Putty > serial console, it repeats over an over: > > U-Boot SPL 2018.01-g6d540394a4 (Aug 22 2018 - 16:33:01) > Trying to boot from MMC1 > *** Warning - bad CRC, using default environment > > I'm copying MLO, zImage, u-boot.img, and am335x-boneblack.dtb to the BOOT > (1st) partition of my uSD card. Then extracting > core-image-minimal-beaglebone.tar.xz -C to the ROOT (2nd) partition of my > uSD card. This works fine when using meta-yocto-bsp, but not with meta-ti. > So, if anyone can help me understand what the different steps are between > using the two different layers, I'd greatly appreciate it. Spent several > days trying to figure this out so far. > > Thanks in advance, > Leo > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-ti mailing list > meta-ti@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti