From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] pipe: prevent compiler reordering in pipe_poll
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2018 00:05:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180824230549.GP6515@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180824225431.tpaxuck7idgnj3b7@dcvr>
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:54:31PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> The pipe_poll function does not use locks, and adding an entry
> to the waitqueue is not guaranteed to happen before pipe->nrbufs
> (or other fields) are read, leading to missed wakeups.
>
> Looking at Ruby CI build logs and backtraces, I've noticed
> occasional instances where processes are stuck in select(2) or
> ppoll(2) with a pipe.
>
> I don't have access to the systems where this is happening to
> test/reproduce the problem, and haven't been able to reproduce
> it locally on less-powerful hardware, either. However, it seems
> like a problem based on similar comments in
> fs/eventfd.c::eventfd_poll made by Paolo.
You are misinterpreting those comments. That load *can't* migrate
to anything earlier than taking queue lock, since that acts as
an acquire barrier. READ_ONCE in eventfd_poll() is not to prevent
compiler reordering - it's to prevent insane compiler doing multiple
loads on possibly changing variable (ctx->count there).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-25 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-24 22:54 [RFC] pipe: prevent compiler reordering in pipe_poll Eric Wong
2018-08-24 23:05 ` Al Viro [this message]
2018-09-10 8:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180824230549.GP6515@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=normalperson@yhbt.net \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.