From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] srcu: Make early-boot call_srcu() reuse workqueue lists
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:46:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180829224609.5ffdc9ec@vmware.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180830020701.GE4225@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 19:07:01 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:56:16PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 14:23:13 -0700
> > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Allocating a list_head structure that is almost never used, and, when
> > > used, is used only during early boot (rcu_init() and earlier), is a bit
> > > wasteful. This commit therefore eliminates that list_head in favor of
> > > the one in the work_struct structure. This is safe because the work_struct
> > > structure cannot be used until after rcu_init() returns.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/srcutiny.h | 2 --
> > > include/linux/srcutree.h | 3 +--
> > > kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c | 10 +++++-----
> > > kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 11 +++++------
> > > 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/srcutiny.h b/include/linux/srcutiny.h
> > > index 2b5c0822e683..f41d2fb09f87 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/srcutiny.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/srcutiny.h
> > > @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ struct srcu_struct {
> > > struct rcu_head *srcu_cb_head; /* Pending callbacks: Head. */
> > > struct rcu_head **srcu_cb_tail; /* Pending callbacks: Tail. */
> > > struct work_struct srcu_work; /* For driving grace periods. */
> > > - struct list_head srcu_boot_entry; /* Early-boot callbacks. */
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> > > struct lockdep_map dep_map;
> > > #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
> > > @@ -49,7 +48,6 @@ void srcu_drive_gp(struct work_struct *wp);
> > > .srcu_wq = __SWAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER(name.srcu_wq), \
> > > .srcu_cb_tail = &name.srcu_cb_head, \
> > > .srcu_work = __WORK_INITIALIZER(name.srcu_work, srcu_drive_gp), \
> > > - .srcu_boot_entry = LIST_HEAD_INIT(name.srcu_boot_entry), \
> > > __SRCU_DEP_MAP_INIT(name) \
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/srcutree.h b/include/linux/srcutree.h
> > > index 9cfa4610113a..0ae91b3a7406 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/srcutree.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/srcutree.h
> > > @@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ struct srcu_struct {
> > > /* callback for the barrier */
> > > /* operation. */
> > > struct delayed_work work;
> > > - struct list_head srcu_boot_entry; /* Early-boot callbacks. */
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> > > struct lockdep_map dep_map;
> > > #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
> > > @@ -110,7 +109,7 @@ struct srcu_struct {
> > > .sda = &pcpu_name, \
> > > .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.lock), \
> > > .srcu_gp_seq_needed = -1UL, \
> > > - .srcu_boot_entry = LIST_HEAD_INIT(name.srcu_boot_entry), \
> > > + .work = __DELAYED_WORK_INITIALIZER(name.work, NULL, 0), \
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> Glad you like it! Does it actually work for you? ;-)
Oh, you want me to actually test it too? ;-)
I'll try to add that in my todo list tomorrow.
-- Steve
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > -- Steve
> >
> > > __SRCU_DEP_MAP_INIT(name) \
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
> > > index d233f0c63f6f..b46e6683f8c9 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
> > > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static int init_srcu_struct_fields(struct srcu_struct *sp)
> > > sp->srcu_gp_waiting = false;
> > > sp->srcu_idx = 0;
> > > INIT_WORK(&sp->srcu_work, srcu_drive_gp);
> > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sp->srcu_boot_entry);
> > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sp->srcu_work.entry);
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -185,8 +185,8 @@ void call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> > > if (!READ_ONCE(sp->srcu_gp_running)) {
> > > if (likely(srcu_init_done))
> > > schedule_work(&sp->srcu_work);
> > > - else if (list_empty(&sp->srcu_boot_entry))
> > > - list_add(&sp->srcu_boot_entry, &srcu_boot_list);
> > > + else if (list_empty(&sp->srcu_work.entry))
> > > + list_add(&sp->srcu_work.entry, &srcu_boot_list);
> > > }
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_srcu);
> > > @@ -224,8 +224,8 @@ void __init srcu_init(void)
> > > srcu_init_done = true;
> > > while (!list_empty(&srcu_boot_list)) {
> > > sp = list_first_entry(&srcu_boot_list,
> > > - struct srcu_struct, srcu_boot_entry);
> > > - list_del_init(&sp->srcu_boot_entry);
> > > + struct srcu_struct, srcu_work.entry);
> > > + list_del_init(&sp->srcu_work.entry);
> > > schedule_work(&sp->srcu_work);
> > > }
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > > index e79c1929328f..36a2857c84e0 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > > @@ -186,7 +186,6 @@ static int init_srcu_struct_fields(struct srcu_struct *sp, bool is_static)
> > > mutex_init(&sp->srcu_barrier_mutex);
> > > atomic_set(&sp->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt, 0);
> > > INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&sp->work, process_srcu);
> > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sp->srcu_boot_entry);
> > > if (!is_static)
> > > sp->sda = alloc_percpu(struct srcu_data);
> > > init_srcu_struct_nodes(sp, is_static);
> > > @@ -709,8 +708,8 @@ static void srcu_funnel_gp_start(struct srcu_struct *sp, struct srcu_data *sdp,
> > > if (likely(srcu_init_done))
> > > queue_delayed_work(rcu_gp_wq, &sp->work,
> > > srcu_get_delay(sp));
> > > - else if (list_empty(&sp->srcu_boot_entry))
> > > - list_add(&sp->srcu_boot_entry, &srcu_boot_list);
> > > + else if (list_empty(&sp->work.work.entry))
> > > + list_add(&sp->work.work.entry, &srcu_boot_list);
> > > }
> > > spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(sp, flags);
> > > }
> > > @@ -1324,10 +1323,10 @@ void __init srcu_init(void)
> > >
> > > srcu_init_done = true;
> > > while (!list_empty(&srcu_boot_list)) {
> > > - sp = list_first_entry(&srcu_boot_list,
> > > - struct srcu_struct, srcu_boot_entry);
> > > + sp = list_first_entry(&srcu_boot_list, struct srcu_struct,
> > > + work.work.entry);
> > > check_init_srcu_struct(sp);
> > > - list_del_init(&sp->srcu_boot_entry);
> > > + list_del_init(&sp->work.work.entry);
> > > queue_work(rcu_gp_wq, &sp->work.work);
> > > }
> > > }
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-30 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-29 21:20 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] SRCU updates for v4.20/v5.0 Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 21:23 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] srcu: Make call_srcu() available during very early boot Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-30 18:24 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu v2 " Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 21:23 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcutorture: Test early boot call_srcu() Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 21:23 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] srcu: Make early-boot call_srcu() reuse workqueue lists Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-30 1:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-30 2:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-30 2:46 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2018-08-30 3:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-30 16:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-30 17:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-30 17:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-30 18:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-30 23:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-30 23:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-31 0:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-31 0:55 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180829224609.5ffdc9ec@vmware.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.