All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	npiggin@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk,
	luc.maranget@inria.fr, akiyks@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC LKMM 1/7] tools/memory-model: Add extra ordering for locks and remove it for ordinary release/acquire
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 20:28:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180831182845.GA4673@andrea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180831160640.GG30626@arm.com>

> > Yes, it's true that implementing locks with atomic_cmpxchg_acquire 
> > should be correct on all existing architectures.  And Paul has invited 
> > a patch to modify the LKMM accordingly.  If you feel that such a change 
> > would be a useful enhancement to the LKMM's applicability, please write 
> > it.
> 
> Yes, please! That would be the "RmW" discussion which Andrea partially
> quoted earlier on, so getting that going independently from this patch
> sounds like a great idea to me.

That was indeed one of the proposal we discussed.  As you recalled, that
proposal only covered RmWs load-acquire (and ordinary store-release); in
particular, I realized that comments such as:

  "The atomic_cond_read_acquire() call above has provided the
   necessary acquire semantics required for locking."

   [from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c]

(for example)  would still _not have "generic validity" _if we added the
above po-unlock-rf-lock-po term... (which, again, makes me somehow uncon-
fortable);  Would to have _all_ the acquire be admissible for you?

  Andrea


> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Will

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-31 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-29 21:10 [PATCH RFC memory-model 0/7] Memory-model changes Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 1/7] tools/memory-model: Add extra ordering for locks and remove it for ordinary release/acquire Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-30 12:50   ` Andrea Parri
2018-08-30 21:31     ` Alan Stern
2018-08-30 21:31       ` Alan Stern
2018-08-31  9:17       ` Andrea Parri
2018-08-31 14:52         ` Alan Stern
2018-08-31 14:52           ` Alan Stern
2018-08-31 16:06           ` Will Deacon
2018-08-31 18:28             ` Andrea Parri [this message]
2018-09-03  9:01               ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-03 17:04                 ` Will Deacon
2018-09-04  8:11                   ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-04 19:09                     ` Alan Stern
2018-09-04 19:09                       ` Alan Stern
2018-09-05  7:21                       ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-05 14:33                         ` Akira Yokosawa
2018-09-05 14:53                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-09-05 15:00                           ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-05 15:04                             ` Akira Yokosawa
2018-09-05 15:24                               ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-03 17:52                 ` Alan Stern
2018-09-03 17:52                   ` Alan Stern
2018-09-03 18:28                   ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-06  1:25                 ` Alan Stern
2018-09-06  1:25                   ` Alan Stern
2018-09-06  9:36                   ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-07 16:00                     ` Alan Stern
2018-09-07 16:00                       ` Alan Stern
2018-09-07 16:09                       ` Will Deacon
2018-09-07 16:39                         ` Daniel Lustig
2018-09-07 16:39                           ` Daniel Lustig
2018-09-07 17:38                           ` Alan Stern
2018-09-07 17:38                             ` Alan Stern
2018-09-08  0:04                             ` Daniel Lustig
2018-09-08  0:04                               ` Daniel Lustig
2018-09-08  9:58                             ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-11 19:31                               ` Alan Stern
2018-09-11 19:31                                 ` Alan Stern
2018-09-11 20:03                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-09-12 14:24                                   ` Alan Stern
2018-09-12 14:24                                     ` Alan Stern
2018-09-13 17:07                                   ` Alan Stern
2018-09-13 17:07                                     ` Alan Stern
2018-09-14 14:37                                     ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-14 16:29                                       ` Alan Stern
2018-09-14 16:29                                         ` Alan Stern
2018-09-14 19:44                                         ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-14 21:08                                       ` [PATCH v5] " Alan Stern
2018-09-14 21:08                                         ` Alan Stern
2018-09-15  3:56                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-09-03 17:05               ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 1/7] " Will Deacon
2018-08-31 17:55           ` Andrea Parri
2018-08-29 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 2/7] doc: Replace smp_cond_acquire() with smp_cond_load_acquire() Paul E. McKenney
2018-09-14 16:59   ` Will Deacon
2018-09-14 18:20     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 3/7] EXP tools/memory-model: Add more LKMM limitations Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-30  9:17   ` Andrea Parri
2018-08-30 22:18     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-31  9:43       ` Andrea Parri
2018-09-06 18:34         ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 4/7] tools/memory-model: Fix a README typo Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 5/7] EXP tools/memory-model: Add scripts to check github litmus tests Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 6/7] EXP tools/memory-model: Make scripts take "-j" abbreviation for "--jobs" Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC LKMM 7/7] EXP tools/memory-model: Add .cfg and .cat files for s390 Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-31 16:06   ` Will Deacon
2018-09-01 17:08     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-09-14 16:36 ` [PATCH RFC memory-model 0/7] Memory-model changes Paul E. McKenney
2018-09-14 17:19   ` Alan Stern
2018-09-14 17:19     ` Alan Stern
2018-09-14 18:29     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180831182845.GA4673@andrea \
    --to=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.