From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Handle memory shortage on pasid table allocation Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 16:14:08 +0300 Message-ID: <20180903131408.GG2283@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20180901062416.6107-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180901062416.6107-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lu Baolu Cc: Joerg Roedel , David Woodhouse , ashok.raj@intel.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jacob Pan List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 02:24:16PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > Pasid table memory allocation could return failure due to memory > shortage. Limit the pasid table size to 1MiB because current 8MiB > contiguous physical memory allocation can be hard to come by. W/o > a PASID table, the device could continue to work with only shared > virtual memory impacted. So, let's go ahead with context mapping > even the memory allocation for pasid table failed. > > Fixes: cc580e41260d ("iommu/vt-d: Per PCI device pasid table interfaces") > Cc: Ashok Raj > Cc: Jacob Pan > Cc: Mika Westerberg This fixes the issue I was seeing, thanks! Tested-by: Mika Westerberg