From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 03 Sep 2018 15:45:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:54645 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP
        id S23991344AbeICNp2cLmZP (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org>);
        Mon, 3 Sep 2018 15:45:28 +0200
Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110)
        id 9F1DD208A1; Mon,  3 Sep 2018 15:45:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [37.71.171.242])
        by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7934220799;
        Mon,  3 Sep 2018 15:45:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date:   Mon, 3 Sep 2018 15:45:22 +0200
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc:     Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>, ralf@linux-mips.org,
        paul.burton@mips.com, jhogan@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        mark.rutland@arm.com, davem@davemloft.net, kishon@ti.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, allan.nielsen@microchip.com,
        linux-mips@linux-mips.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] mscc: ocelot: add support for SerDes muxing
 configuration
Message-ID: <20180903134522.GC13888@piout.net>
References: <20180903093308.24366-1-quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>
 <20180903133415.GF4445@lunn.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180903133415.GF4445@lunn.ch>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Return-Path: <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0)
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
X-archive-position: 65897
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
X-original-sender: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=unsubscribe%20linux-mips>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: linux-mips <linux-mips.eddie.linux-mips.org>
X-List-ID: linux-mips <linux-mips.eddie.linux-mips.org>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ecartis@linux-mips.org?subject=subscribe%20linux-mips>
List-owner: <mailto:ralf@linux-mips.org>
List-post: <mailto:linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
List-archive: <http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/>
X-list: linux-mips

On 03/09/2018 15:34:15+0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > I suggest patches 1 and 8 go through MIPS tree, 2 to 5 and 11 go through
> > net while the others (6, 7, 9 and 10) go through the generic PHY subsystem.
> 
> Hi Quentin
> 
> Are you expecting merge conflicts? If not, it might be simpler to gets
> ACKs from each maintainer, and then merge it though one tree.
> 

There are some other DT changes for this cycle so those should probably
go through MIPS.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com