All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dmi tree with Linus' tree
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 14:51:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180904145152.5dae4343@endymion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180904091950.2e49b1a5@canb.auug.org.au>

Hi Stephen,

On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 09:19:50 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the dmi tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/acpi/bus.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   ae976358cd7b ("Revert "ACPI / bus: Parse tables as term_list for Dell XPS 9570 and Precision M5530"")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   767b174cad46 ("ACPI / bus: Only call dmi_check_system on X86")
> 
> from the dmi tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thanks for the heads up. I have rebased my dmi tree on top of 4.19-rc2,
and this solves the conflict.

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

      reply	other threads:[~2018-09-04 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-03 23:19 linux-next: manual merge of the dmi tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2018-09-04 12:51 ` Jean Delvare [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180904145152.5dae4343@endymion \
    --to=jdelvare@suse.de \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.