From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42306) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fxKut-000283-OX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 19:39:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fxKuq-0007o8-Ds for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 19:39:27 -0400 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:56569) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fxKup-0007m9-V7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 19:39:24 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 19:39:19 -0400 From: "Emilio G. Cota" Message-ID: <20180904233919.GA25010@flamenco> References: <20180810173941.5301-1-cota@braap.org> <20180831222249.GA28489@flamenco> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] target/riscv: use tcg_lookup_and_goto_ptr List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alistair Francis Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , Sagar Karandikar , Bastian Koppelmann , Palmer Dabbelt , Richard Henderson , Michael Clark , Alistair Francis On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 13:18:28 -0700, Alistair Francis wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 13:39:38 -0400, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > >> Changes wrt v1: changed patch 3 as suggested by Richard. Also > >> added his R-b's. > >> > >> You can fetch this series from: > >> https://github.com/cota/qemu/tree/riscv-lookup_ptr-v2 > > > > RISC-V maintainers: any plans of picking this up for 3.1? > > Thanks for CCing me. > > I think Michael must be really busy, I haven't seen any activity for > awhile. I'm going to send a PR with everything that has been reviewed > and applies cleanly. Thanks! Did patch 1 not apply cleanly? I see it's not part of the pullreq you just sent. I'd like the three patches to go in in the original order, since the perf numbers in patch 3's commit log are laid out assuming that is the case. Cheers, Emilio