Re: [PATCH 2/7] mark root hnode explicitly

[Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>]

On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 08:23:36PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:

> Pretty sure there is a 'tp' in u32_set_parms() parameter list.
> 
> Are you saying it is not what you want? If so, why?
> 
> More importantly, why this information is again missing in your
> changelog? This patch is definitely not trivial, it deserves a detailed
> changelog.
> 
> 
> > our own root, sure.  But there's nothing to stop doing the same via another
> > tcf_proto...
> 
> To my best knowledge, the place where you set ->is_root=true
> is precisely same with where we set tp->root=root_ht, and it doesn't
> change after set. What am I missing here?

The fact that there can be two (or more) different tcf_proto instances sharing
->data, but not ->root.  And since ->data is shared, u32_get() on one tp
will be able to return you ->root of *ANOTHER* one.  So comparison with
tp->root doesn't protect you.  Try this on mainline:

tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress
tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 100 handle 1: u32 divisor 1
tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 200 handle 2: u32 divisor 1
tc filter delete dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 100 handle 801: u32

and watch the fun as soon as you get an incoming packet on eth0.  That panic
is fixed by 1/7, but you get "Not allowed to delete root node" for removing
_your_ root, with "Can not delete in-use filter" for other's root (as in the
last line of the reproducer).