From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: Regression in next with filesystem context concept
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:08:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180910160836.GT5662@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11959.1536420266@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
* David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> [180908 15:28]:
> Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Looks like next-20180906 now has a regression where mounting
> > > > root won't work with commit fd0002870b45 ("vfs: Implement a
> > > > filesystem superblock creation/configuration context").
> > >
> > > Am I right in thinking you're not using any of the LSMs?
> >
> > Assuming LSM as in Documentation/lsm.txt, right not using any.
>
> The default return value for security_fs_context_parse_param() should be
> -ENOPARAM, both in security.h and security.c.
>
> I've fixed my tree and Al has pulled it, but we're now waiting on Stephen
> Rothwell to refresh linux/next.
OK thanks for tracking that down, next-20180910 boots again
for me.
Regards,
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Regression in next with filesystem context concept
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:08:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180910160836.GT5662@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11959.1536420266@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
* David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> [180908 15:28]:
> Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Looks like next-20180906 now has a regression where mounting
> > > > root won't work with commit fd0002870b45 ("vfs: Implement a
> > > > filesystem superblock creation/configuration context").
> > >
> > > Am I right in thinking you're not using any of the LSMs?
> >
> > Assuming LSM as in Documentation/lsm.txt, right not using any.
>
> The default return value for security_fs_context_parse_param() should be
> -ENOPARAM, both in security.h and security.c.
>
> I've fixed my tree and Al has pulled it, but we're now waiting on Stephen
> Rothwell to refresh linux/next.
OK thanks for tracking that down, next-20180910 boots again
for me.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-10 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-06 16:43 Regression in next with filesystem context concept Tony Lindgren
2018-09-06 16:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-06 18:11 ` Naresh Kamboju
2018-09-06 18:11 ` Naresh Kamboju
2018-09-07 8:47 ` David Howells
2018-09-07 8:47 ` David Howells
2018-09-07 16:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-07 16:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-07 17:35 ` Andreas Kemnade
2018-09-07 17:35 ` Andreas Kemnade
2018-09-08 15:24 ` David Howells
2018-09-08 15:24 ` David Howells
2018-09-10 16:08 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2018-09-10 16:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-10 18:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-09-10 18:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-09-10 19:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-10 19:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-09-10 19:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-09-10 19:32 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180910160836.GT5662@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.