From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:39:36 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] irqchip: RISC-V Local Interrupt Controller Driver In-Reply-To: References: <20180910132924.GA6987@infradead.org> <20180910133902.GB21593@infradead.org> <20180910134915.GB30774@infradead.org> <20180910161143.GA1053@infradead.org> Message-ID: <20180910163936.GA18699@infradead.org> To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:05:42PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > I am quite sure RISC-V spec does not restrict the use of other > local interrupts. Different CPU implementations can have their > own local interrupts. Please take a look at sections 3.1.14 and 4.1.1 of the RISC-V privileged spec 1.10. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DBBC433F5 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:39:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621DF2087F for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:39:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="kkMm18Zs" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 621DF2087F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728799AbeIJVeg (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:34:36 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:36604 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728764AbeIJVeg (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:34:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=IOiSLtWUSUZ5BxDbaMYKnZ161a2t26ig5e0H4gJzwNE=; b=kkMm18Zshu7jt3ER95QbAEYBZ 2q4U8JdW0TTRgPEd3Ea5/ZfPRJYTC3j4LaDBEP4cDYQmnXkBTrxkDbz5A5yPz+SZ4UJQukBqI2Xcs ccpVkWQ1ptyuldQjtbJcAeHIG6+YRt4Zq7KEgt+UVto+7AMjIldNYFwiZNS29V32/Z0AV9oDfoZ0T icUzZC4hp+fnNG6MdqIuhX4LiQClcK/Ka0ingG6EN9KBAIeC1XN8ksrFvKfB9nBGvZuFf/R87M0lP KT4ibZDZ7vHSg4Fie+PNFw4nAiJzwvmsaPKdU93s6EARbP9AuTyWblCnOvua+TUL1iQ1+qpE7sPIH ln/7N8Q7Q==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fzPDs-0005kG-7Z; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:39:36 +0000 Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:39:36 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Anup Patel Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Thomas Gleixner , Daniel Lezcano , Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier , Palmer Dabbelt , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List" , Atish Patra , Albert Ou , Palmer Dabbelt , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] irqchip: RISC-V Local Interrupt Controller Driver Message-ID: <20180910163936.GA18699@infradead.org> References: <20180910132924.GA6987@infradead.org> <20180910133902.GB21593@infradead.org> <20180910134915.GB30774@infradead.org> <20180910161143.GA1053@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:05:42PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > I am quite sure RISC-V spec does not restrict the use of other > local interrupts. Different CPU implementations can have their > own local interrupts. Please take a look at sections 3.1.14 and 4.1.1 of the RISC-V privileged spec 1.10.