From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: ksummit <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] API replacement/deprecation
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 06:34:36 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180911063436.2f6d696e@coco.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ftyg315d.fsf@intel.com>
Em Tue, 11 Sep 2018 11:10:22 +0300
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> escreveu:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> wrote:
> > IMHO, whatever solution, the best would be to have a makefile
> > target equivalent to allmodconfig and allyesconfig that would
> > add such extra maintainership logic.
>
> There's 'make W=n' for enabling extra gcc checks. Seems like a good fit.
I wouldn't mess with W. On media, we work to have zero warnings with W=1.
However, W=2 (and W=3) is almost unusable: lots of complains about
signed/unsigned mix and other things that usually are ok. With gcc 8,
the amount of warnings with W=2/W=3 at core kAPI functions makes them
useless.
People will very likely ignore or miss deprecated stuff if we
place it as W=4.
Perhaps we could add a D=1, in order to point for deprecated stuff.
Regards,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-11 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-05 22:57 [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] API replacement/deprecation Kees Cook
2018-09-05 23:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-09-06 2:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-09-06 6:12 ` Julia Lawall
2018-09-06 18:24 ` Kees Cook
2018-09-06 23:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-09-06 23:24 ` Kees Cook
2018-09-07 7:03 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-09-07 7:20 ` Johannes Berg
2018-09-07 7:31 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-09-07 9:42 ` Julia Lawall
2018-09-07 8:04 ` Jani Nikula
2018-09-07 9:38 ` Julia Lawall
2018-09-07 9:54 ` Jani Nikula
2018-09-07 10:05 ` Julia Lawall
2018-09-07 10:43 ` Jani Nikula
2018-09-07 10:25 ` Alexandre Belloni
2018-09-07 11:44 ` Mark Brown
2018-09-10 12:51 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-11 8:10 ` Jani Nikula
2018-09-11 9:34 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2018-09-11 11:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-09-07 8:19 ` Jan Kara
2018-09-07 14:33 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-09-07 16:10 ` Kees Cook
2018-09-07 20:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-09-07 20:56 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-09-08 8:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-09-08 15:19 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-09-10 12:28 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-10 16:09 ` Kees Cook
2018-09-07 10:14 ` Dan Carpenter
2018-09-07 10:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-09-07 8:40 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-09-06 4:44 ` Julia Lawall
2018-09-06 10:04 ` Linus Walleij
2018-09-06 10:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-09-06 14:59 ` Kees Cook
2018-09-06 15:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180911063436.2f6d696e@coco.lan \
--to=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.