From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs/119: fix too small log size error
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 21:15:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180912131509.GA17817@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180912110404.32673-1-zlang@redhat.com>
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 07:04:04PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> xfs/119 fails on 4k hard sector size device if reflink (with/without
> rmapbt) is enabled:
>
> # mkfs.xfs -f -m reflink=1,rmapbt=0 -l version=2,size=2560b,su=64k /dev/sdf
> log size 2560 blocks too small, minimum size is 2688 blocks
> # mkfs.xfs -f -m reflink=1,rmapbt=1 -l version=2,size=2560b,su=64k /dev/sdf
> log size 2560 blocks too small, minimum size is 4368 blocks
>
> So remove log size parameter and run mkfs.xfs again if it fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> I saw Dave changed the log size once in commit:
> d0a3cc5a xfs/104: log size too small for 4k sector drives
>
> But it's still not enough after we have reflink feature now. I don't
> know why this case need "-l version=2,size=2560b,su=64k",
> if someone learns about this case, please tell me how to change this
> case properly. If the log size parameter is not necessary, I'd like
> to remove it.
I guess we still need the log size param, as the test is testing
"freeze/thaws on a small log fs", please see commit 3ebdf78c16cb ("Test
out pv#942130 where the unmount rec is not ungranting log space. Merge
of master-melb:xfs-cmds:23759a by kenmcd."), but we don't have much
background information from that ancient commit log..
Thanks,
Eryu
>
> Thanks,
> Zorro
>
> tests/xfs/119 | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/119 b/tests/xfs/119
> index bf7f1ca8..d507aacf 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/119
> +++ b/tests/xfs/119
> @@ -40,7 +40,14 @@ sync
>
> export MKFS_OPTIONS="-l version=2,size=2560b,su=64k"
> export MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o logbsize=64k"
> -_scratch_mkfs_xfs >/dev/null
> +_scratch_mkfs_xfs >/dev/null 2>&1
> +# The specified log size maybe too small if new features (e.g: reflink
> +# or/and rmapbt) is enabled. So if mkfs fails, don't specify log size
> +# and try to mkfs again.
> +if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> + export MKFS_OPTIONS="-l version=2,su=64k"
> + _scratch_mkfs_xfs >/dev/null
> +fi
>
> _scratch_mount
>
> --
> 2.14.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-12 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-12 11:04 [PATCH] xfs/119: fix too small log size error Zorro Lang
2018-09-12 13:15 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2018-09-12 15:25 ` Zorro Lang
2018-09-13 8:32 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180912131509.GA17817@desktop \
--to=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.