All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] introduce for_each_process_thread_break() and for_each_process_thread_continue()
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 18:33:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180912163312.GA18739@redhat.com> (raw)

Resend.

IMHO this makes sense anyway, but mostly this is preparation for other changes.
show_state_filter() and other "slow" users of for_each_process() can livelock
and even trigger hard lockups.

Peter, you have already reviewed at least 1/2 (heh, two years ago) and iirc
you were mostly agree but pointed out that for_each_xxx() in _continue() could
be SPEND_TOO_MUCH_TIME themselves. I added a note into the changelog.

Oleg.

 include/linux/sched/signal.h | 10 ++++++++++
 kernel/exit.c                | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/hung_task.c           | 25 +++++++++----------------
 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)


             reply	other threads:[~2018-09-12 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-12 16:33 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2018-09-12 16:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] introduce for_each_process_thread_break() and for_each_process_thread_continue() Oleg Nesterov
2018-09-12 19:25   ` Andrew Morton
2018-09-13 15:55     ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-09-12 16:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] hung_task: change check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks() to use for_each_process_thread_break/continue Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180912163312.GA18739@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.