From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4FF7DE6F for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728093AbeINTzS (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Sep 2018 15:55:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com ([209.85.128.68]:53088 "EHLO mail-wm1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728065AbeINTzR (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Sep 2018 15:55:17 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id y139-v6so2174163wmc.2 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 07:40:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bgdev-pl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=j5VzygIMcTmrTIR1xvM1gLa6GSilUZBltKq95M6HHPU=; b=NuUWQ0egq5rhjpw96ov2rRI14N6D+0MsBMpOYkRNZtSP5snOGM0p0hOHaB5O6RxBMH UnChgkAplDVWzwWnmdYoiUN/Oe7vq2SPZTD7/8GHCfvrGE654PuT8T6nYE7PljvqAknR FqmA2v39WYp7tPjBST6OL7uuk0Rxk2tqjOiQ3xFbriEEfYepT/ZJJrE0h4+Ov5KX1RdE KeLnkxgAPMzY5Fwt/Dqx1EAIY/MbTMIkhutJmW3japw7DI5c+W+X7KE1Xc6pZPOPm1LH diS9rHT5V1shii+T12U/vdn2MmgQDFLMBGqGeekoYvZBWXPz59o0ERbhGGUEbdsUuuoF qhHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=j5VzygIMcTmrTIR1xvM1gLa6GSilUZBltKq95M6HHPU=; b=NeoxTK/FCZZ7m+7mAHe5EGt3CbycABZwCWRDM+YaSwXOnT6uD/ntSd9mXR1jgt+7Ue 4X14gbvz9uP2iW+byfBUKg2uDkIED5lohMf2vurFRcepi7La9d9MJ1zcUExrDkmrLrXo sndwrYYlVJBHO4Vl35N7ifWT8skjw5lcHnvNMntxXLVQUjo62mveb3kY3WPzvyzhQ0vx o+8B7LQ10sX/qmkyHqIT7yWhX7192wTs366xwxdiUoz58c5LYoDEZX9HK8VfB/HNckOy qLM/DV9iFQTJgxXknMCR1kuHzcatzWr2DMwSLFcEuBvNu+43+cxvcmP9lQ3QKaYMEkWD oEZw== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51Cau//98pFi9fk0HTdHZTvcPLkCoJRNwuqk7EBbOSZVIS1+DEom jzURr024ypB3c3kMwAdD5Jjgnw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZlclLE5F7JZ+fJ/2PhQs9vzg3y/gJAwDStgrA06ANeyynHGGfYQpupAayEc+5lWmP4KuUM4w== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:c501:: with SMTP id v1-v6mr2681386wmf.115.1536936027782; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 07:40:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brgl-bgdev.home ([2a01:cb1d:af:5b00:e837:b8d5:48c1:571b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v46-v6sm10313526wrc.63.2018.09.14.07.40.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Sep 2018 07:40:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Bartosz Golaszewski To: Srinivas Kandagatla , "David S . Miller" , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , Jonathan Corbet , Sekhar Nori , Kevin Hilman , David Lechner , Boris Brezillon , Andrew Lunn , Alban Bedel , Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Bartosz Golaszewski Subject: [PATCH v4 03/22] nvmem: use list_for_each_entry_safe in nvmem_device_remove_all_cells() Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 16:39:52 +0200 Message-Id: <20180914144011.27614-4-brgl@bgdev.pl> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 In-Reply-To: <20180914144011.27614-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> References: <20180914144011.27614-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org From: Bartosz Golaszewski Use the provided helper for iterating over list entries without having to use the list_entry() macro. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski --- drivers/nvmem/core.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c index 8987da0f7456..b69005367908 100644 --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c @@ -308,14 +308,11 @@ static void nvmem_cell_drop(struct nvmem_cell *cell) static void nvmem_device_remove_all_cells(const struct nvmem_device *nvmem) { - struct nvmem_cell *cell; - struct list_head *p, *n; + struct nvmem_cell *cell, *p; - list_for_each_safe(p, n, &nvmem_cells) { - cell = list_entry(p, struct nvmem_cell, node); + list_for_each_entry_safe(cell, p, &nvmem_cells, node) if (cell->nvmem == nvmem) nvmem_cell_drop(cell); - } } static void nvmem_cell_add(struct nvmem_cell *cell) -- 2.18.0 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: brgl@bgdev.pl (Bartosz Golaszewski) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 16:39:52 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v4 03/22] nvmem: use list_for_each_entry_safe in nvmem_device_remove_all_cells() In-Reply-To: <20180914144011.27614-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> References: <20180914144011.27614-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> Message-ID: <20180914144011.27614-4-brgl@bgdev.pl> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org From: Bartosz Golaszewski Use the provided helper for iterating over list entries without having to use the list_entry() macro. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski --- drivers/nvmem/core.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c index 8987da0f7456..b69005367908 100644 --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c @@ -308,14 +308,11 @@ static void nvmem_cell_drop(struct nvmem_cell *cell) static void nvmem_device_remove_all_cells(const struct nvmem_device *nvmem) { - struct nvmem_cell *cell; - struct list_head *p, *n; + struct nvmem_cell *cell, *p; - list_for_each_safe(p, n, &nvmem_cells) { - cell = list_entry(p, struct nvmem_cell, node); + list_for_each_entry_safe(cell, p, &nvmem_cells, node) if (cell->nvmem == nvmem) nvmem_cell_drop(cell); - } } static void nvmem_cell_add(struct nvmem_cell *cell) -- 2.18.0