From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Dmitry Safonov" <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>,
"Dmitry Safonov" <dima@arista.com>,
"Daniel Axtens" <dja@axtens.net>,
"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Michael Neuling" <mikey@neuling.org>,
"Mikulas Patocka" <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
"Nathan March" <nathan@gt.net>, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi>,
"Peter Hurley" <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rong, Chen" <rong.a.chen@intel.com>,
"Sergey Senozhatsky" <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
"Tan Xiaojun" <tanxiaojun@huawei.com>,
"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Jiri Slaby" <jslaby@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCHv5 7/7] tty/ldsem: Decrement wait_readers on timeouted down_read()
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:52:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180917235258.5719-8-dima@arista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180917235258.5719-1-dima@arista.com>
It seems like when ldsem_down_read() fails with timeout, it misses
update for sem->wait_readers. By that reason, when writer finally
releases write end of the semaphore __ldsem_wake_readers() does adjust
sem->count with wrong value:
sem->wait_readers * (LDSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS - LDSEM_WAIT_BIAS)
I.e, if update comes with 1 missed wait_readers decrement, sem->count
will be 0x100000001 which means that there is active reader and it'll
make any further writer to fail in acquiring the semaphore.
It looks like, this is a dead-code, because ldsem_down_read() is never
called with timeout different than MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT, so it might be
worth to delete timeout parameter and error path fall-back..
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c
index d4d0dbf4a6d9..717292c1c0df 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c
@@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ down_read_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout)
raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
if (waiter.task) {
atomic_long_add_return(-LDSEM_WAIT_BIAS, &sem->count);
+ sem->wait_readers--;
list_del(&waiter.list);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
put_task_struct(waiter.task);
--
2.13.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-17 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-17 23:52 [PATCHv5 0/7] tty: Hold write ldisc sem in tty_reopen() Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-17 23:52 ` [PATCHv5 1/7] tty: Drop tty->count on tty_reopen() failure Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-18 13:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-09-18 14:15 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-17 23:52 ` [PATCHv5 2/7] tty/ldsem: Wake up readers after timed out down_write() Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-18 13:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-09-18 14:12 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-17 23:52 ` [PATCHv5 3/7] tty: Hold tty_ldisc_lock() during tty_reopen() Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-18 13:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-09-18 14:19 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-17 23:52 ` [PATCHv5 4/7] tty: Simplify tty->count math in tty_reopen() Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-17 23:52 ` [PATCHv5 5/7] tty/ldsem: Convert to regular lockdep annotations Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-17 23:52 ` [PATCHv5 6/7] tty/ldsem: Add lockdep asserts for ldisc_sem Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-18 13:49 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-09-18 14:21 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-17 23:52 ` Dmitry Safonov [this message]
2018-09-19 16:56 ` [PATCHv5 0/7] tty: Hold write ldisc sem in tty_reopen() Mikulas Patocka
2018-09-19 17:35 ` Mikulas Patocka
2018-09-19 17:45 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-19 20:03 ` Mikulas Patocka
2018-09-19 20:21 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-20 14:25 ` Mikulas Patocka
2018-10-15 13:37 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180917235258.5719-8-dima@arista.com \
--to=dima@arista.com \
--cc=0x7f454c46@gmail.com \
--cc=dja@axtens.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=nathan@gt.net \
--cc=pasik@iki.fi \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=tanxiaojun@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.