From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: doronrk@fb.com, tom@quantonium.net, davejwatson@fb.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kcm: remove any offset before parsing messages
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 04:58:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180918025837.GA3548@nautica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180917.195150.315319338322641005.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller wrote on Mon, Sep 17, 2018:
> > No, they can see it, so it's possible to make a KCM program that works
> > right now if you are careful (I'm not sure why the offset within bpf is
> > different from the offset in the kernel though, it looks like the bpf
> > program skips the qos part of the control buffer)
>
> What helper is used in the BPF program to get this offset value?
>
> (also good info to add to the commit message)
Dave defined one himself ; for a simple protocol where the offset is in
the first four bytes of the message.
The whole bpf program could look like this:
------
struct kcm_rx_msg { int full_len; int offset; };
static inline struct kcm_rx_msg *kcm_rx_msg(struct __sk_buff *skb) {
return (struct kcm_rx_msg *)skb->cb;
}
int decode_framing(struct __sk_buff *skb) {
return load_word(skb, kcm_rx_msg(skb)->offset);
}
------
If we go towards documenting it, adding a helper would be useful yes;
buf if we pull that becomes unnecessary.
(I'll add the example program in the commit message anyway at your
suggestion)
--
Dominique Martinet
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-18 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-11 9:21 [PATCH v2] kcm: remove any offset before parsing messages Dominique Martinet
2018-09-12 5:36 ` Dominique Martinet
2018-09-18 1:45 ` David Miller
2018-09-18 1:57 ` Dominique Martinet
2018-09-18 2:40 ` David Miller
2018-09-18 2:45 ` Dominique Martinet
2018-09-18 2:51 ` David Miller
2018-09-18 2:58 ` Dominique Martinet [this message]
2018-10-31 2:56 ` Dominique Martinet
2019-02-15 1:00 ` Dominique Martinet
2019-02-15 1:20 ` Tom Herbert
2019-02-15 1:57 ` Dominique Martinet
2019-02-15 2:48 ` Tom Herbert
2019-02-15 3:31 ` Dominique Martinet
2019-02-15 4:01 ` Tom Herbert
2019-02-15 4:52 ` Dominique Martinet
2019-02-20 4:11 ` Dominique Martinet
2019-02-20 16:18 ` Tom Herbert
2019-02-21 8:22 ` Dominique Martinet
2019-02-22 19:24 ` Tom Herbert
2019-02-22 20:27 ` Dominique Martinet
2019-02-22 21:01 ` Tom Herbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180918025837.GA3548@nautica \
--to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=davejwatson@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=doronrk@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@quantonium.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.