All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: don't treat unknown di_flags[2] as corruption in scrub
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 20:18:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180918031840.GC20086@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be811b64-5630-e9eb-313f-3aa1f809ba79@redhat.com>

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 09:41:35PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> xchk_inode_flags[2]() currently treats any di_flags[2] values that the
> running kernel doesn't recognize as corruption, and calls
> xchk_ino_set_corrupt() if they are set.  However, it's entirely possible
> that these flags were set in some newer kernel and are quite valid,
> but ignored in this kernel.
> 
> (Validators don't care one bit about unknown di_flags[2].)
> 
> Call xchk_ino_set_warning instead, because this may or may not actually
> indicate a problem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/inode.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/inode.c
> index 5b3b177..e53ed83 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/inode.c
> @@ -126,8 +126,9 @@

Would be nice to know which function this is, but it otherwise seems
fine to me:

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

--D

>  {
>  	struct xfs_mount	*mp = sc->mp;
>  
> +	/* Unknown di_flags could simply be from newer kernel */
>  	if (flags & ~XFS_DIFLAG_ANY)
> -		goto bad;
> +		xchk_ino_set_warning(sc, ino);
>  
>  	/* rt flags require rt device */
>  	if ((flags & (XFS_DIFLAG_REALTIME | XFS_DIFLAG_RTINHERIT)) &&
> @@ -172,8 +173,9 @@
>  {
>  	struct xfs_mount	*mp = sc->mp;
>  
> +	/* Unknown di_flags2 could simply be from newer kernel */
>  	if (flags2 & ~XFS_DIFLAG2_ANY)
> -		goto bad;
> +		xchk_ino_set_warning(sc, ino);
>  
>  	/* reflink flag requires reflink feature */
>  	if ((flags2 & XFS_DIFLAG2_REFLINK) &&
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-18  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-18  2:41 [PATCH] xfs: don't treat unknown di_flags[2] as corruption in scrub Eric Sandeen
2018-09-18  3:18 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-09-18  5:20 ` Dave Chinner
2018-09-18 12:11   ` Eric Sandeen
2018-09-18 12:18     ` Dave Chinner
2018-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH V2] xfs: don't treat unknown di_flags2 " Eric Sandeen
2018-09-18 14:15   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180918031840.GC20086@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.