Re: pinctrl-icelake: driver writes to wrong offsets?

[Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:16:41AM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 1:13 AM Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 05:18:34PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote:
> > > This is to report what I think is a problem in the pinctrl-icelake
> > > driver. It seems that when trying to control GPIO pins GPP_A* and
> > > GPIO_B*, the driver ends up writing to incorrect PADCFG registers.
> > > I've reached this conclusion by putting debug prints in the driver,
> > > although this can be seen by the following commands too. Please let me
> > > know if something is wrong in my experiments. For example, when trying
> > > to control GPP_B8/ISH_I2C1_SCL, the driver ends up writing to
> > > GPP_A6/ESPI_RESETB registers.
> >
> > Hmm, when you add debug prints to the driver and you access GPIO 224
> > (GPP_B8/ISH_I2C1_SCL) from userspace you can see that the driver
> > actually uses PADCFG registers of GPP_A6/ESPI_RESETB? So that it is not
> > just a side-effect of how the pins are wired on your board.
> 
> Right, also I don't have to use put debug prints as it can be seen
> from the following debug files. And it is not isolated to just this
> pin. For instance, in this examples you can see that another pin 18
> (GPP_B10/I2C5_SCL) that I'm trying to write , the value actually gets
> written to the PADCFG for (GPP_A8/I2S2_SFRM) i.e. pin42. So there is
> clearly a pattern:
> 
> static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc icllp_pins[] = {
>  ...
>         /* GPP_B */
> ..
>         PINCTRL_PIN(18, "I2C5_SCL"),  <----- GPP_B10/I2C5_SCL = Pin 18
> ....
> localhost /sys/class/gpio # cat
> /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/INT3455\:00/gpio-ranges
> GPIO ranges handled:
> 0: INT3455:00 GPIOS [184 - 191] PINS [0 - 7]
> 32: INT3455:00 GPIOS [216 - 241] PINS [8 - 33]  <---- pin 18 = gpio 226
> ....
> 
> localhost /sys/class/gpio # cat
> /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/INT3455\:00/pins | grep
> "I2C5_SCL\|(I2S2_SFRM)"
> pin 18 (I2C5_SCL) mode 1 0x44000702 0x0000002a 0x00000000 [ACPI]
> pin 42 (I2S2_SFRM) mode 2 0x44000b00 0x00000040 0x00000100 [ACPI]
> localhost /sys/class/gpio #
> localhost /sys/class/gpio # echo 226 > export
> localhost /sys/class/gpio # cat
> /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/INT3455\:00/pins | grep
> "I2C5_SCL\|(I2S2_SFRM)"
> pin 18 (I2C5_SCL) GPIO 0x44000102 0x0000002a 0x00000000 [ACPI]
> pin 42 (I2S2_SFRM) mode 2 0x44000b00 0x00000040 0x00000100 [ACPI]
> localhost /sys/class/gpio #
> localhost /sys/class/gpio #
> localhost /sys/class/gpio # cat gpio226/value
> 0
> localhost /sys/class/gpio # cat gpio226/direction
> in
> localhost /sys/class/gpio # echo out > gpio226/direction
> localhost /sys/class/gpio # cat gpio226/direction
> out
> localhost /sys/class/gpio # cat
> /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/INT3455\:00/pins | grep
> "I2C5_SCL\|(I2S2_SFRM)"
> pin 18 (I2C5_SCL) GPIO 0x44000200 0x0000002a 0x00000000 [ACPI]
> pin 42 (I2S2_SFRM) mode 2 0x44000b00 0x00000040 0x00000100 [ACPI]
> localhost /sys/class/gpio #
> localhost /sys/class/gpio #
> localhost /sys/class/gpio # cat gpio226/value
> 0
> localhost /sys/class/gpio # echo 1 > gpio226/value
> localhost /sys/class/gpio # cat gpio226/value
> 0
> localhost /sys/class/gpio # cat
> /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/INT3455\:00/pins | grep
> "I2C5_SCL\|(I2S2_SFRM)"
> pin 18 (I2C5_SCL) GPIO 0x44000200 0x0000002a 0x00000000 [ACPI]
> pin 42 (I2S2_SFRM) mode 2 0x44000b01 0x00000040 0x00000100 [ACPI]
> localhost /sys/class/gpio #
> 
> As you can see in the above example, when I export the pins and change
> the directions from "in" to "out" PADCFG get updated correctly for pin
> 18, but when writing the value, it is the PADCFG for pin 42 that gets
> updated which is incorrect.

It looks like we are missing translation (call intel_gpio_to_pin()) in
intel_gpio_set(), intel_gpio_get() and intel_gpio_get_direction(). IIRC
gpiolib handles the translation but here it seems not. Strange.

> So this looks like a driver issue to me. Please let me know if I need
> to file a bug on bugzilla for this.

I agree, definitely driver issue. Please file bugzilla about this (add
me and Andy there as well) and we'll investigate.

Thanks!