From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 6189EE00B45; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:20:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mail.seebs.net (mail.seebs.net [162.213.38.76]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BACEE00939 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:20:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seebsdell (unknown [38.32.44.26]) by mail.seebs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E85B2E8922; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:20:48 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:20:48 -0500 From: Seebs To: Joshua Watt Message-ID: <20180918162048.35454f8d@seebsdell> In-Reply-To: References: <6a084eda5fcb4423a647bb998471e26d@AUSX13MPC104.AMER.DELL.COM> <6bdfdff49ca04924979eba1da729d7e1@AUSX13MPC104.AMER.DELL.COM> <0c3dff3db46a4a83a73a4ffe1c83535d@AUSX13MPC104.AMER.DELL.COM> <340e2fcca899a6691605df89eb89f0e7e7802916.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <767f0527074648f48702fedcdb928152@AUSX13MPC104.AMER.DELL.COM> <20180918160944.43679aec@seebsdell> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [pseudo] Pseudo 1.8+ xattr sqlite corruption X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 21:20:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:16:22 -0500 Joshua Watt wrote: > Are the databases supposed to be shareable between different build > machines? IIRC, the answer is no. Could you store the native inode > type as a sqlite BLOB? Not necessarily a good idea.... Just an idea. I think coercing the values into range is probably safer. It should be trivial enough... -s