All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/i915/runtime_pm: Share code to enable/disable PCH reset handshake
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 22:04:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180918190412.GA5565@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180918181015.11001-1-jose.souza@intel.com>

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:10:10AM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Instead of have the same code spread into 4 platforms lets share it.
> BXT do not have a PCH so here also handling this case by unseting
> RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE.
> 
> v2(Rodrigo):
> - renamed to intel_pch_reset_handshake()
> - added comment about why BXT need the bit to be unset
> 
> v3(Rodrigo and Ville):
> - added bool have_pch to intel_pch_reset_handshake()
> - added back BXT comment
> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 30 ++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 9bebec389de1..4e050dc3ebde 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -3239,18 +3239,29 @@ static void icl_mbus_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	I915_WRITE(MBUS_ABOX_CTL, val);
>  }
>  
> +static void intel_pch_reset_handshake(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +				      bool have_pch)

You seem very intent on moving the HAS_PCH_NOP() into this function.
I still don't like that approach. I think it's clearner to let the
caller 100% decide whether to enable or disable the reset handshake.

> +{
> +	u32 val = I915_READ(HSW_NDE_RSTWRN_OPT);
> +
> +	if (have_pch)
> +		val |= RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE;
> +	else
> +		val &= ~RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE;
> +
> +	I915_WRITE(HSW_NDE_RSTWRN_OPT, val);
> +}
> +
>  static void skl_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  				   bool resume)
>  {
>  	struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &dev_priv->power_domains;
>  	struct i915_power_well *well;
> -	uint32_t val;
>  
>  	gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE);
>  
>  	/* enable PCH reset handshake */
> -	val = I915_READ(HSW_NDE_RSTWRN_OPT);
> -	I915_WRITE(HSW_NDE_RSTWRN_OPT, val | RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE);
> +	intel_pch_reset_handshake(dev_priv, true);
>  
>  	/* enable PG1 and Misc I/O */
>  	mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
> @@ -3306,7 +3317,6 @@ void bxt_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  {
>  	struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &dev_priv->power_domains;
>  	struct i915_power_well *well;
> -	uint32_t val;
>  
>  	gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE);
>  
> @@ -3316,9 +3326,7 @@ void bxt_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	 * Move the handshake programming to initialization sequence.
>  	 * Previously was left up to BIOS.
>  	 */
> -	val = I915_READ(HSW_NDE_RSTWRN_OPT);
> -	val &= ~RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE;
> -	I915_WRITE(HSW_NDE_RSTWRN_OPT, val);
> +	intel_pch_reset_handshake(dev_priv, false);
>  
>  	/* Enable PG1 */
>  	mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
> @@ -3439,9 +3447,7 @@ static void cnl_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool resume
>  	gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE);
>  
>  	/* 1. Enable PCH Reset Handshake */
> -	val = I915_READ(HSW_NDE_RSTWRN_OPT);
> -	val |= RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE;
> -	I915_WRITE(HSW_NDE_RSTWRN_OPT, val);
> +	intel_pch_reset_handshake(dev_priv, true);
>  
>  	/* 2. Enable Comp */
>  	val = I915_READ(CHICKEN_MISC_2);
> @@ -3524,9 +3530,7 @@ static void icl_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE);
>  
>  	/* 1. Enable PCH reset handshake. */
> -	val = I915_READ(HSW_NDE_RSTWRN_OPT);
> -	val |= RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE;
> -	I915_WRITE(HSW_NDE_RSTWRN_OPT, val);
> +	intel_pch_reset_handshake(dev_priv, true);
>  
>  	for (port = PORT_A; port <= PORT_B; port++) {
>  		/* 2. Enable DDI combo PHY comp. */
> -- 
> 2.19.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-18 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-18 18:10 [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/i915/runtime_pm: Share code to enable/disable PCH reset handshake José Roberto de Souza
2018-09-18 18:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] drm/i915: Unset reset pch handshake when PCH is not present in one place José Roberto de Souza
2018-09-18 18:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] drm/i915: Do not modifiy reserved bit in gens that do not have IPC José Roberto de Souza
2018-09-18 18:10 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] drm/i915: Move SKL IPC WA to HAS_IPC() José Roberto de Souza
2018-09-18 20:04   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-09-18 18:10 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] drm/i915: Move IPC WA #1141 to init_ipc() José Roberto de Souza
2018-09-18 20:05   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-09-18 18:10 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] drm/i915: Remove duplicated definition of intel_update_rawclk José Roberto de Souza
2018-09-18 19:04 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2018-09-18 19:40   ` [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/i915/runtime_pm: Share code to enable/disable PCH reset handshake Souza, Jose
2018-09-18 20:07     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-09-18 19:34 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v3,1/6] " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180918190412.GA5565@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.