From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 01/11] asm-generic/tlb: Provide a comment Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:33:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20180919113305.GC24124@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180913092110.817204997@infradead.org> <20180913092811.894806629@infradead.org> <20180914164857.GG6236@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180914164857.GG6236@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Will Deacon Cc: aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, npiggin@gmail.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 05:48:57PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > + * - tlb_change_page_size() > > This doesn't seem to exist in my tree. > [since realised you rename to it in the next patch] > > > + * Additionally there are a few opt-in features: > > + * > > + * HAVE_MMU_GATHER_PAGE_SIZE > > + * > > + * This ensures we call tlb_flush() every time tlb_change_page_size() actually > > + * changes the size and provides mmu_gather::page_size to tlb_flush(). > > Ah, you add this later in the series. I think Nick reckoned we could get rid > of this (the page_size field) eventually... Right; let me fix that ordering..