From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BROKEN] common/rc: fix check for disabled kmemleak
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:19:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180922141949.GC17817@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180918104456.12778-1-amir73il@gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 01:44:56PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> With kernel commit b353756b2b71 ("kmemleak: always register debugfs file")
> that was merged to v4.19-rc3, the kmemleak debugfs knob exists even if
> kmemleak is disabled, but returns EBUSY on write.
>
> Suppress EBUSY errors from _check_kmemleak() by removing write permission
> from knob on failure to initialize kmemleak.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Guys,
>
> With kernel v4.19-rc3, tests started printing noisy messages about failure
> to write to kmemleak knob.
>
> Problem is that kmemleak was disabled on my system but the test for
> kmemleak enabled we have in place was broken by the kernel change.
>
> I tried this patch to hack around the new kernel behavior, but something
> is broken in this patch as it doesn't suppress all errors.
I guess that's because root has writable permission even if the file has
no 'w' permission bit set, i.e the "if [ ! -w $kern_knob ]" check never
triggers even if we "chmod a-w $kern_knob".
But, on the other hand, I prefer not changing a system file's permission
in test (even if it could hack around the issue). Checking if a special
file exists would be better, like what we do in _check_dmesg and
_check_filesystems.
For example, touch $RESULT_BASE/check_kmemleak in _init_kmemleak if
kmemleak is available, remove the file otherwise. Note that we cannot
create this file in $RESULT_DIR like other similar checks because it's
not initialized at _init_kmemleak time.
Thanks,
Eryu
> For me, I prefer to have kmemleak enabled anyway, so I gave up on this
> hack and enabled kmemleak.
>
> If someone is interested in taking over, be my guest.
>
> FYI, to enable kmemleak on kvm-xfstests I needed to configure
> CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_EARLY_LOG_SIZE=5000
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_DEFAULT_OFF is not set
>
> Thanks,
> Amir.
>
> common/rc | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> index ec631ad9..cafc83b4 100644
> --- a/common/rc
> +++ b/common/rc
> @@ -3514,8 +3514,14 @@ _init_kmemleak()
>
> # Disable the automatic scan so that we can control it completely,
> # then dump all the leaks recorded so far.
> - echo "scan=off" > "$kern_knob"
> - _capture_kmemleak /dev/null
> + if echo "scan=off" > "$kern_knob" 2>/dev/null; then
> + _capture_kmemleak /dev/null
> + else
> + # Since kernel v4.19-rc3, the knob exists even if kmemleak is
> + # disabled, but returns EBUSY on write. Suppress EBUSY errors
> + # from _check_kmemleak() by removing write permission from knob
> + chmod a-w "$kern_knob"
> + fi
> }
>
> # check kmemleak log
> --
> 2.17.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-22 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-18 10:44 [PATCH][BROKEN] common/rc: fix check for disabled kmemleak Amir Goldstein
2018-09-18 14:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-09-18 15:18 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-09-22 14:19 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180922141949.GC17817@desktop \
--to=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.